News Story

The CapCon Guide: What to know about right-to-work in Michigan, post-repeal

Government employees can’t be forced to pay unions, even after Michigan loses right-to-work status

Since the repeal of Michigan’s right-to-work laws, many people have been confused about the effect the repeal will have on their workplace. They have been left wondering whether they can be forced to join a union, and whether they must pay for a union’s political activities. The Mackinac Center has prepared the following overview of where the law stands now, to help Michiganders understand and exercise their rights in the workplace. 

It is important to be clear about what right-to-work does. In a right-to-work state, employees cannot be forced to pay a union what is known as an “agency” or “service” fee.

This fee represents the portion of dues that covers a union’s representational activities, such as negotiating contracts or representing workers in grievance hearings. It does not include the portion of dues that are devoted to political activity. Agency fees are typically 85%-90% of dues. 

With right-to-work repealed, some employees can be forced to pay these agencies fees. If these employees refuse to pay, they can be fired. Importantly, however, not all Michigan employees have lost right-to-work protections.

There are two types of employees: public sector and private sector. Public sector employees work for the government or one of its subdivisions. Common examples include school employees, university employees, state employees, and people who work for a county or other local government. Teachers in public schools, firefighters, police officers, and state and municipal employees are public sector workers.

Private sector employees, on the other hand, work for private companies. They include most manufacturing employees, employees in the hospitality industry, employees in the service industry, and some hospital employees. 

Whether an employee is a public sector one or private sector one is an essential distinction, but it isn’t always an easy one to make. Employees who are unsure about their status should speak to a supervisor for help.

Employees can also check their employer’s website, to see if they are subject to the Michigan Freedom of Information Act. If any portion of an employer’s website discusses FOIA, they are likely a public employer, and those who work for it are likely public employees. 

It is important for workers to understand whether they are public or private sector employees because that distinction determines what the end of right-to-work means for them. Public sector employees are not directly affected by the repeal of right-to-work, thanks to a 2018 Supreme Court case known as Janus v. AFSCME. 

In Janus, the Supreme Court recognized that everything a public sector union does, even bargaining for the terms of a contract, is inherently political. This because even negotiating wages and other terms and conditions of employment — the foundational activity of a union — sets government policy.

As a result, public sector workers cannot be forced to pay to support the union’s political speech. 

This means that public sector employees can’t be forced to join a union. They also can’t be forced to pay agency fees. 

Private sector employees are not so fortunate.

The First Amendment does not apply to private companies, and as a result, neither does the Janus decision. This means that private sector employees who had previously opted out of union membership can now be forced to pay agency fees.

This does not mean, however, that private sector employees can be forced to join a union as full members. Under Communications Workers of America v. Beck, a different Supreme Court ruling, a private sector employee is not required to become a full union member—only an agency fee payer.  

In summary:
•    Public sector workers are government workers, and have constitutional right-to-work protections thanks to Janus.
•    Private sector workers work for private companies, and with right-to-work repealed, must choose between paying agency fees and keeping their jobs.
•    Public sector workers cannot be forced to join a union or pay agency fees.
•    Private sector workers cannot be forced to join the union but can be forced to pay agency fees.

The repeal of right-to-work is unfortunate, not just for the state’s economy but for those individual workers who will be denied the right to chose whether to affiliate with a union. Right-to-work has enormous benefits, and helps enrich workers lives. Even though the law is repealed, we at the Mackinac Center remained dedicated to ensuring workers understand their rights and can make an informed decision about their options in the workplace. 

Stephen Delie is director of Workers for Opportunity at the Mackinac Center. Email him at delie@mackinac.org.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

Analysis

Michiganders want energy choice; Michigan can’t deliver it

Michigan’s Electric Choice program has more people waiting for it than using it

For a brief moment in the 21st century, Michiganders had freedom of choice in the electric market.

That blip of time lasted from 2002 until 2008, when Public Act 286 reinstituted the protected status of monopoly utilities in Michigan.

Two companies — DTE Energy and Consumers Energy — would split up most of the Lower Peninsula, while two others would take the Upper Peninsula. Among them they’d control 90% of Michigan’s electricity market.

“That change meant alternative energy suppliers were now limited to providing no more than 10% of the retail electricity sold in the state,” writes Jason Hayes, the Mackinac Center’s director of energy and environmental policy, in his Policy Guide to Energy Choice in Michigan, published in 2019.

The Mackinac Center publishes several such policy guides annually. Some of the most recent ones address tax cuts, education and corporate welfare.

Between 2002 to 2008, Michigan residents could use an alternative energy supplier.

But in the monopoly era, things changed for the worse. As Hayes found:

Great Lakes states with choice markets have electricity rates that are, on average, about 23% lower than Michigan’s largely regulated electricity market. The 10% cap on choice has the effect of limiting customer access to lower-priced electricity rates and provides little incentive for the monopoly utilities to make their rates competitively priced.

And what about that 10% of customers who were allowed the right to choose? The Michigan Public Service Commission’s report on electric choice in 2022 reveals there are more people on the waitlist than in the program.

“As of December 2022, there were approximately 5,760 customers participating in the electric choice programs (compared to 5,939 in 2021),” the commission wrote. “As of December 2022, approximately 6,213 customers remain in the queue, an increase from 5,962 in 2021.”

So from 2021 to 2022, the user base shrank while the waitlist grew. Energy choice was a reality for fewer than 5,800 homes in Michigan last year.

After back-to-back mass power outages in February and March, Michigan lawmakers promised reform. Energy legislation offered in 2023 does not begin to address energy reliability. And the bill package that comes the closest would compromise reliability by requiring a 100% transition to renewable energy by 2035.

Never mentioned, in House and Senate energy committee hearings after the storms, was energy choice. Opening the utilities to competition. Ending the monopolies.

As DTE and Consumers continue to spend money on wind and solar, rather than fortify a grid served by reliable energy sources, why shouldn’t Michiganders be able to choose energy companies more committed to delivering the service their customers pay for?

Michigan’s coming energy crisis will not owe to a lack of resources or understanding about how to keep our homes heated and the lights on. It will be man-made, and it will owe to the eagerness of politicians to leap before they look on the energy transition.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.