Analysis

Hawaii offers a case study on the inadequacies of wind and solar

Rolling blackouts could prove deadly in Michigan winters

Rolling blackouts in the Aloha State presage things to come in Michigan.

Michigan’s new net-zero and “100% clean energy” policies mirror Hawaii’s “goal of 100% renewable energy by 2045.” These energy plans are causing both states to rely on more weather-dependent wind and solar, which means that reliability issues are becoming more pronounced.

On Jan. 8 and 9, heavy rains hit much of the island of Oahu. News releases from Hawaiian Electric, the island’s main electric utility, explained that during the storm two large generating units at the Waiau Power Plant had gone offline. In an email, company officials said that water damaged a control system at one plant. The system at a second plant “tripped after a tie-in to the grid was damaged, likely by weather.”

That was unfortunate timing, for as the utility noted, it had also recently taken several generation units offline for scheduled maintenance. Lower electricity demand at this time of year lets the company plan maintenance outages that are not possible in the summer, when air conditioning drives greater customer demand.

In the email, utility officials said they had “plenty of reserve margin until we didn’t,” which is when the two big plants went down. For readers who may not be familiar with utility-speak, reserve margin is effectively a cushion that helps a company supply its customers with the electricity they want. “A reserve margin of 15% means that an electric system has excess capacity in the amount of 15% of expected peak demand,” as the Energy Information Administration explains.

Reserve margin capacity must also be dispatchable. In layman’s terms, that means the generating facility can produce electricity when it is needed, as opposed to when weather conditions allow. When utilities close dispatchable fossil fuel plants and attempt to replace them with non-dispatchable wind and solar, their ability to reliably supply electricity suffers when the weather doesn’t cooperate.

Officials at Hawaii Electric said that “for most big outages, it’s never just one thing. It’s always a confluence of unexpected events happening all at once.” Behind this confluence, however, is a policy choice, Joe Kent, executive vice president of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, says. “Hawaii's mandate to reach 100% renewable by the year 2045 is happening simultaneous to the updating of its out-of-date infrastructure, and therefore, reliable power is needed now more than ever. But renewable energy is not well-suited to provide reliable power generation.”

Information from Hawaiian Electric backs up Kent’s statement. “Due to heavy cloud cover and rainy conditions across the island, production from solar energy systems [was] reduced and battery energy storage systems could not charge to full capacity,” it said online. Energy generation from wind facilities “started to fall off significantly” and “due to insufficient generation, earlier this evening Hawaiian Electric began ‘load shedding.’”

Load shedding means systematically shutting off customers to, in the utility’s words, “avoid a more widespread outage or damage to the electric system from an imbalance of too much demand versus too little available generation.”

"If we want to avoid blackouts in the future,” Kent says, “Hawaii policymakers need to ask tough questions about whether the renewable mandate goal is feasible, given the challenges involved.”

High on the list of those challenges is the state’s aging generation and transmission infrastructure. On both the mainland and in Hawaii, the electric grid has increasingly been powered by a more diverse mix of reliable energy options — nuclear, natural gas, coal, fuel oil, biomass and hydroelectric.

As states implement net-zero mandates, utilities are moving away from that diversity. In its place they move toward a system that uses natural gas as a backup for reliably unreliable wind and solar. But with that type of system, a disruption in gas supplies that coincides with a lull in the wind or sun can easily bring on blackouts and supply shortages. In periods of high demand — during storms, or in very hot or very cold weather — a lull in wind or solar generation, or a disruption in gas supplies, can produce the same outcome.

To its credit, Hawaiian Electric is planning to replace the aging oil-fired steam boilers at the Waiau Power Plant with dispatchable and “fuel-flexible” simple-cycle combustion turbines. “The new units will use the same technology employed by aviation or jet turbine engines and can run on biodiesel, diesel and potentially hydrogen,” the company says. “The technology allows for quick start up and shut down, which will result in fewer operating hours compared to the existing steam turbine boilers that the new units will replace.”

Kent’s demand for answers from policymakers grows more pressing as more states force a transition to non-dispatchable power sources. Is it reasonable to expect that utilities can complete systemwide upgrades as they also work toward 100% renewable energy goals?

Hawaii offers a case study on the feasibility of a government-driven energy transition. Hawaii’s utilities can’t depend on the electric grids in other states, so the state becomes a place where we can see if wind and solar can stand on their own, or if they're just grid parasites with good PR. Right now, some states on the mainland can ditch fossil fuels because they’re still connected to other states with fossil fuels, allowing them to make up for bad energy choices.

Prioritizing net-zero over grid reliability means that we’re pushing our electric grid to the edge. The more we rely on weather-dependent generation sources, the more we put our lives, health, and safety at risk should the wind not blow or the sun not shine.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

News Story

Michigan population council: Nobody to blame for poor-performing schools

Michigan schools ‘built for bygone era,’ advisory board warns

One of the Growing Michigan Together Council’s December recommendations to increase the state’s population is to address the increasing challenges in the declining education system.

The council’s report states that teachers are not at fault for poor student performance, but it also recommends more teacher interventions to help students. Michigan lawmakers enacted laws that weaken teacher evaluations shortly before the report came out. The new laws allow school districts to reduce the frequency of teacher evaluations from annual to biennial or triennial for teachers not in a probationary period who received three effective ratings in a row.

The report states:

Michigan’s relatively weak performance educationally is not the fault of its students or parents, and it’s certainly not the fault of its teachers. Michigan has a systemic problem. Namely, we have an education system built for a bygone era that lacks coherence.

The report goes on to recommend spending more money and reining in the “autonomy and flexibility” of colleges as ways to fix Michigan’s failing education system. There are numerous studies that show teachers and parents play a significant role in students’ long-term academic outcomes.

Edutopia cites C. Kirabo Jackson, an economics professor at Northwestern University.

Looking at data on over 570,000 students in North Carolina, Jackson found that ninth-grade teachers who improved their students’ noncognitive skills — which include motivation and the ability to adapt to new situations, as well as self-regulation — had important impacts on those students. They were more likely to have higher attendance and grades and to graduate than their peers. They were also less likely to be suspended and to be held back a grade. These benefits persisted throughout high school.

Although the council states that teachers are not to blame for poor student achievement, it goes on to recommend interventions for teachers that include disrupting students’ schedules.

“Getting there requires new designs for schooling, which may include structuring the school day to give teachers opportunities to work together, learn to improve their own practice, and consider how to best organize teaching and learning across their school,” the report states on page 38. “Our school environments are not currently set up for teachers’ ongoing learning and development.”

In 2024, Michigan will begin a five-year project to spend $50 million on mentorship programs for teachers, counselors and administrators. The Michigan Department of Education has identified lack of mentorship programs as a weakness that caused employees to flee the school system. 

The Michigan Association of Secondary School Principals supports the watered-down teacher evaluations enacted last year. The association highlights the new laws on its website that.

“This change should create a significant workload reduction for building administrators,” the association says.

“The report emphasizes the weak performance of Michigan’s schools but denies the critical role that teachers play,” Molly Macek, education policy director at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, told CapCon. “Yet it recommends restructuring the school day to create more time for teacher learning. Unfortunately, administrators will be spending less time measuring how this extra teacher learning time impacts student achievement, because a new law watered down the teacher evaluation process.”

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.