House Minority Leader Tim Greimel, D-Auburn Hills, is calling for $12 million to be restored to the $50 million originally appropriated for film production subsidies in the current year. The money was cut by an executive order signed by Gov. Rick Snyder.

The news site MIRS reported that Greimel’s spokeswoman Katie Carey said the film credit program “has been a good job creator for the state.”

“I think if you did an investigation of all the tax credits, you'd find that with the film credits, that's one of the areas that has been a big boon for the state of Michigan for both job creation and economic vitality for local communities,” Carey told MIRS.

However, the Bureau of Labor Statistics doesn’t back up Carey’s claim.

According to the BLS, there were 1,537 “motion picture and video production jobs” in 2001 and 1,561 of those jobs in 2013, the latest year data is available (see image nearby). The state has spent $494.4 million on the film credit program from 2008 through 2014.

The governor's order to cut the $12 million from the film production subsidies was issued in response to an unexpected hit to state fund balances caused by higher-than-expected payouts to some corporations granted long-term tax credit deals, mostly under the previous administration. The order included some other modest cuts and was quickly given the required approval by the Legislature's appropriation committees.

Meanwhile, state Rep. Dan Lauwers, R-Brockway, has introduced House Bill 4122 to end the film subsidies. The Michigan Chamber of Commerce also called for the state to end them.

“This boondoggle currently costs Michigan taxpayers $50 million a year and even the state’s own economic development agency (MEDC) reported this costly subsidy failed in 2013 to create one permanent job,” said Tricia Kinley, senior director of tax and regulatory reform at the chamber, in a press release. “The time to end this wasteful spending is long overdue and we are urging the Legislature to take immediate action.”

Film credits, and industry-specific subsidies and tax breaks in general, erode the tax base and force the overall tax rate on everyone else to be higher, said Liz Malm, an economist with the Tax Foundation.

“An ideal tax system is one that has a broad base – that is, taxes everyone – so that rates can be lower for everyone. The tax code shouldn't favor one industry,” she said in an email.

Greimel’s office didn’t respond to an email seeking comment.

The big story on the state budget this year is the hit it has taken from behind. In the current fiscal year businesses have claimed $681 million in tax credits. Next year the hit is expected to be even greater, at $807 million. Those credits were doled out in previous years through the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC), which is the state’s corporate welfare agency.

Gov. Rick Snyder and the Legislature are struggling with the impact on the current and next year's spending plans. Budget-trimming is usually a healthy practice; but being forced to trim spending to pay for handouts to businesses and corporations is something else entirely. What’s worse, it could provide officials with an excuse to push for tax increases.

The so-called “mainstream media” is engaged and reporting on this issue. What it almost surely will not report is how the news media’s long-standing failure to apply proper journalistic skepticism to these programs contributed to the mess. For more than a decade, the news media has shirked its responsibility to demand that MEDC provide basic transparency. It wasn't necessarily the reporters who were at fault, either – the responsibility lies higher up the food chain.

The idea behind all of MEDC’s various programs and credits is to use taxpayer dollars to provide businesses with incentives (let’s face it – bribes) to create jobs. This columnist has repeatedly questioned whether this is a proper role for government; undoubtedly in the weeks to come a number of lawmakers will be publicly stating that same thing. Nonetheless, what’s especially infuriating is that – because much of the pertinent data remains hidden – there is no objective means of measuring how many – if any – jobs were created for the huge cost to taxpayers.

Audits of MEDC programs, performed by the Office of the Auditor General, have revealed small glimpses of the agency’s job creation track record; and that track record has been abysmal. An audit released in 2013 showed that “at most” only 19 percent of the jobs that were projected to be created under the MEDC’s 21st Century Jobs Fund ever came to fruition. Unfortunately these audits uncover only the tip of the iceberg, because apparently there’s data even the auditors can’t get.

If the tip of the iceberg is that pathetic, why should anyone believe the unavailable information would reveal results that are any better?

Now, here’s the real rub: The public, the legislators and even the governor himself aren’t supposed to know which companies cashed in the credits. That veil of secrecy came into being with a dubious legal opinion roughly seven years ago. But to fully appreciate MEDC’s anti-transparency nature one has to go back to its very roots.

Regarding transparency, the MEDC has never been trustworthy, and for the good and sensible reason that it wasn’t designed to be. It is essentially an advertising agency with a mission to promote projects that allegedly create jobs. Expecting the same agency that promotes projects to provide accurate and unbiased public disclosure about the performance of those same projects is ridiculous. The conflict of interest is so obvious that even a child would understand it.

A completely independent entity outside of MEDC should be in charge of tracking and evaluating its programs. This entity should press for basic – even simple – information, which MEDC doesn’t bother with – such as how many people are employed by businesses that received credits. Only an entity such as this – not the MEDC itself – should be reporting the results to the public.

During the administration of Gov. Jennifer Granholm, the MEDC reported glowing job creation numbers. These jobs, of course, were merely on-paper projections dreamed up at the time that the tax credit deals were announced. Most of the regular news media simply took these press releases and printed them. Asking tough questions, or even noticing and probing some fairly obvious inconsistencies about the job creation claims, was of little or no interest to the news media.

Then the legal ruling came down saying that even the amount of money the businesses were getting couldn’t be disclosed to the public. During this period the news media did begin displaying open skepticism about the claims about the number of jobs created. However, it registered little or no concern over the additional layer of secrecy the new ruling was about to spread over the agency.

When that happened the Legislature should have said, “Either we figure out a way to make this information public or we shut down the MEDC.” It is not surprising that it didn’t do that, especially with the news media (which is supposed to care about transparency) ignoring the situation instead of expressing outrage.

Government should have to account for every cent of public money it spends. That sure seems like a pretty basic principle and one that most people probably assume the news media would defend. Instead the news media compliantly watched as the MEDC made deals under the cover of darkness.

Here’s the really scary part – hopefully it is not true, but one can hardly help wondering – whether the advertising dollars that MEDC and Pure Michigan spends on TV, radio and newspapers played a role in preventing the news media from vigorously pursuing the MEDC transparency issue.