MichiganVotes Bills

Michigan Senate enables state environmental regulations to exceed federal

Gov. Rick Snyder signed a ‘no more stringent’ law in 2018. Senate Bill 14 would gut it.

The Michigan Senate approved a bill Wednesday that would empower the administrative state to craft regulations that exceed federal guidelines.

Senate Bill 14 was introduced by Sen. Sean McCann, D-Kalamazoo, on Jan. 17. It was referred to the Senate Energy and Environment Committee McCann chairs.

Four months later to the day of its introduction, the bill passed 20-18 in the full Senate, in a party-line vote.

Read it for yourself: Senate Bill 14, as passed by the Michigan Senate

In 2018, Gov. Rick Snyder signed Public Act 602. It prohibits state regulators “from adopting or promulgating a rule more stringent than the applicable federally mandated standards,” per the Senate Fiscal Agency analysis of the McCann bill.

Senate Bill 14 would repeal that ban, allowing Michigan regulators to make rules exceeding federal standards.

The vote for Senate Bill 14 went 20-18 down party lines. 

“Some people believe that this prohibition make it difficult for the state to adequately protect its environment and respond to public health emergencies, and so it has been suggested that the prohibiton be deleted,” reads the Senate Fiscal Agency explainer.

The Mackinac Center is not among those people. For more than a decade before Snyder signed “no more stringent” into law, the Mackinac Center had advocated for the policy. 

As former Mackinac Center staffer Russ Harding wrote in 2005:

...a “no-more-stringent” law would prohibit the DEQ [State environmental department] from exceeding a particular federal regulation unilaterally, although it would still allow the Legislature and the governor to pass a tougher regulation if the DEQ presented a compelling case for it. The principle of federalism would be retained; better yet, it would be exercised by elected officials, who are directly accountable to the people of Michigan.

Jason Hayes, the Mackinac Center’s director of energy and environmental policy, offered written testimony against Senate Bill 14 at the committee’s April 13 meeting. Written testimony on the bill split as evenly as the vote itself, with five writing in support, four opposed, and one neutral.

Hayes noed that Public Act 602 of 2018 still allows state regulators to act where federal regulators have not. They just need to demonstrate a “clear and convincing need” to do so.

Hayes wrote that Senate Bill 14 “would represent a regressive step backward for the state of Michigan,” and would “impose an additional layer of expensive and duplicative regulatory pressures on businesses with no real environmental benefits.”

To be enacted into law, the bill would need to pass the House in identical form, then be signed by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. After passage in the Senate, the bill was referred to the House Natural Resources, Environment, Tourism and Outdoor Recreation Committee.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

News Story

In Wisconsin, Nessel asks federal court for emergency shutdown of Line 5

Nessel offered a friend of the court brief arguing in favor of shutting down Line 5 for environmental reasons

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel on Wednesday filed a “friend of the court” brief in federal court in Wisconsin, asking a judge “to take emergency action to protect Lake Superior from an imminent threat posed by Enbridge’s Line 5 pipeline,” her office announced.

Since Nessel took office in 2019, she has, along with Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, targeted the Line 5 pipeline, seeking to shut it down. Nessel’s brief brings the dispute across state lines.

Nessel’s office filed the brief in a lawsuit filed by the Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indian. Enbridge, the owner of Line 5, the defendant, is counter-suing the tribe. Nessel’s brief takes the tribe’s side against the pipeline.

“The alarming erosion at the Bad River meander poses an imminent threat of irreparable harm to Lake Superior which far outweighs the risk of impacts associated with a shutdown of the Line 5 pipeline,” reads a portion of the 18-page brief.

Read it for yourself: AG Dana Nessel’s brief supports shutdown of Line 5 pipeline

As Nessel’s brief notes, the pipeline transports the equivalent of 540,000 barrels of “light crude oil, synthetic light crude oil and/or natural gas liquids” every single day.

Nessel has sued in state court and federal court in Michigan, seeking to shut down the pipeline. Federal litigation is ongoing.

In February, after a high-profile train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, and another less severe derailment in Wayne County, Nessel said on Twitter that transporting fuel by train is not safe for communities near train routes.

That means Nessel opposes both the use of a pipeline and the use of trains to transport 540,000 barrels of fuel daily.

Nessel’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

 

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.