News Story

Michigan lawmaker pitches $2B transit proposal

Wayne State University professor calls plan another boondoggle

A state representative has expensive plans for the state’s little-used mass transit system.

Rep. Jason Morgan, D-Ann Arbor, tweeted a plan last week to use $2 billion in taxpayer funds for transit in Michigan over the next ten years.

“We’ve put forward the boldest plan to support transit and housing in Michigan history,” Morgan wrote on X. “This is the biggest chance we’ve ever had and we’ve shown that such a bold plan is possible.”

State taxpayers already heavily subsidize public transit for the 1.3% of residents who use it. If Morgan’s House Bill 5769 passes, it would allocate $200 million per year over the next ten years to the state’s transit system.

Morgan did not respond to an email seeking comment. But he did engage a skeptic on social media.

“No thanks,” a commenter responded to Morgan’s tweet. “We pay enough in taxes.”

Morgan replied by saying that his plan was not a tax increase.

Morgan’s proposal could leave taxpayers with the bill for another transit boondoggle, John Taylor, associate professor of supply chain management for the Ilitch School of Business at Wayne State University, told Michigan Capitol Confidential. Taylor was the chair of marketing and supply chain management for ten years.

The Detroit Department of Transportation and the Detroit-area Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation, or SMART, have been hemorrhaging money, Taylor said. Both transit systems have seen a large decline in ridership as residents turn to Uber and other options.

Proponents of the spending increase say public subsidies for mass transit are declining. The city of Detroit once paid $90 million annually for the Detroit Department of Transportation, but funding has dropped to $50 million, according to Transportation Riders United. The transportation nonprofit supports Morgan’s $2 billion increase in transit spending.

Wayne State’s Taylor countered that very little has been done to improve transit efficiency and coordinate with the systems that are already in place. The Detroit Department of Transportation and SMART run parallel to each other but have not been able to provide more efficient and reliable service for transit riders.

The new proposal also comes as Michigan roads are projected to fall apart faster than they can be rebuilt. Roads serve 99% of the population, Taylor said, and the state should take care of the road network before funneling more money into public transit.

Taylor also pointed to previous transit initiatives that fell well short of expectations. The Michigan Department of Transportation used a federal grant in 2010 to buy the NS rail line between Dearborn and Kalamazoo.

At the time MDOT thought it would have a passenger rail service from Ann Arbor to Detroit and from Howell to Ann Arbor. The cost was $140 million for 135 miles of rail that MDOT is now responsible for maintaining.

The department also spent $1.1 million per year to lease 23 rail cars that it never used, according to the Detroit Free Press. Taxpayers had spent $12 million on the rail cars by 2015.

Taxpayers in Michigan paid $653.8 million for public transportation programs in the 2022-23 fiscal year, according to the House Fiscal Agency.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

News Story

Michigan State Ed board seeks more charter school regulations

Board resolution singles out schools that educate more than 150,000

The State Board of Education is pursuing new regulations on Michigan charter schools that serve more than 150,000 students.

An April resolution demanded what the board called “transparency” for charter schools, which a department press release defined as a “threat to democratically governed community-based schools.”

The resolution calls on lawmakers to pass laws that would allow charter schools to expand or open only after “consultation with the local district in which the charter will operate.”

There are 285 charter school districts in Michigan responsible for 363 charter schools. The state’s Department of Education oversees these and other school districts and advises the Legislature on education policy.

The resolution supports forcing charter schools to accept transfer students during the school year if space allows. It also calls for a ban on the disenrollment of students based on behavior, academic achievement, disability, English-language proficiency, family status, or living situation.

“The Michigan State Board of Education is fighting to protect the government school monopoly at the expense of students and their families,” Corey A. DeAngelis, senior fellow at the American Federation for Children and author of The Parent Revolution: Rescuing Your Kids from the Radicals Ruining Our Schools, told Michigan Capitol Confidential in a text message. “These regulations would reduce the education options available to Michigan families just to protect the status quo. Underperforming charter schools shut down. Underperforming government schools get more money. Charter schools are directly accountable to families.”

Many other states are expanding education freedom, but the Michigan Democratic Party is a “wholly owned subsidiary of the teachers unions,” DeAngelis said. “It’s shameful because those in power are supposed to work for families and their children, not government school unions.”

Public schools often oppose charter schools, Molly Macek, director of education policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, told CapCon.

“Allowing local public schools to have input on whether a charter school can be allowed to open is like giving Kroger the ability to decide whether a Meijer can open nearby,” Macek said. “Of course, they will always oppose it. That’s not what is good for students and families.”

The new regulations would hurt schools that serve some of the state's most vulnerable students, said Dan Quisenberry, president of the Michigan Association of Public School Academies.

“Charter schools serve a disproportionately higher population of minority students and students in poverty,” Quisenberry told CapCon in an email. “About 50% of students in charter schools are African-American, compared to just 14.1% in traditional public schools. A total of 75.9% of students in charter schools are classified as economically disadvantaged, compared to 47.6% in traditional public schools. Just over 10 percent of all students in Michigan attend a charter schools. In Detroit and Flint, about half the students attend a charter school. Charter schools are free, public, and open to all, and these are students we should be looking to help, not hurt.”

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.