Analysis

In 2012, Michigan voters rejected a ban on right-to-work

Nearly 60% of Michigan voters rejected the attempted constitutional amendment, and Gov. Snyder signed the right-to-work law a month later

Michigan voters have already spoken on right-to-work. In November 2012, a majority of voters rejected an attempt to outlaw right-to-work in Michigan. Any attempt to repeal right-to-work would be in direct contradiction to the spoken will of the people.

If Proposal 2 of 2012 had never been brought to voters, then-Gov. Rick Snyder might not have signed right-to-work legislation.

Snyder, a Republican had been slow to embrace right-to-work and said it was not on his agenda. But he warned unions that if they pursued a constitutional amendment to outlaw right-to-work, things would change.

The unions did pursue an amendment — through Proposal 2 — and things did change. The next month, legislators passed the right-to-work bill and Snyder signed it.

Out of 4,500,955 Michigan voters who cast a ballot on Proposal 2, about 58% voted no, compared to 42% who said yes, according to Michigan Secretary of State data.

Right-to-work gives the individual worker the choice of whether to pay into a union or not. In 2012, voters were asked whether the Michigan Constitution should deny that workers that right. The people spoke, and they said no.

Proposal 2 of 2012 read:

The next month, a right-to-work bill was passed by lawmakers and signed into law by Gov. Rick Snyder.

Unions had attempted to play coy on Prop 2, arguing that it wasn’t really about right-to-work. But as Jack Spencer reported in February 2013, it was, and a union leader admitted it himself.

As Spencer wrote, after a Metro Times interview with then-UAW President Bob King:

King made it even clearer that right-to-work was the issue the unions were concerned about when they came up with Proposal 2. In that context he concluded:

So we in labor said, ‘You know, we can’t just sit and wait for the lame duck, we know it’s coming, this has been a 10-year, at least, effort by [Dick] DeVos and other right-wingers — the Koch brothers were also involved. So it was our leadership responsibility to try and head this off. So we put together Proposal 2.

The Metro Times then asked King the following: “So if Gov. Snyder had publicly committed not to sign right-to-work, Prop. 2 would not have been pursued?”

“That’s right,” King answered.

Democrats have signaled that right-to-work is among their top targets in 2023, when they control both houses of the Michigan Legislature.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

News Story

Survey says: 60% of Michigan residents support right-to-work law, only 17% oppose it

In union households, support is 55% to 28%

When Democrats take over the state Legislature in January, one of their goals may be to repeal the state’s right-to-work law, enacted in late 2012. A new survey of Michigan residents, however, shows that six out of ten people support the law.

When asked about their opinion of the right-to-work law, 60.0% of respondents said they approve it, 17.3% said they oppose it and 22.7% said they have no opinion. The margin of error was plus or minus 3.2%, meaning support within the general population could be as low as 56.8%, or as high as 63.2%.

People who lived in a union household were more likely to support right-to-work (54.5%) than oppose it (28.0%). Among nonunion households, support was even stronger, at 62.7%, with 15.2% opposing right-to-work.

A majority of Republicans, Democrats and independents all supported right-to-work. So did all age groups and income levels, as well as a majority of both men and women.

The survey of 1,026 Michigan residents was conducted Nov. 29 and 30. It asked respondents their age, partisan affiliation and where they lived in the state. It also asked the following question:

“Michigan passed a ‘right-to-work’ law 10 years ago. The law says that nobody can be required to pay dues or fees to a union in order to hold a job, even if they work in a job covered by a union contract. Do you support or oppose this law?”

The Mackinac Center for Public Policy, which publishes Michigan Capitol Confidential, conducted the survey.

Michael Thom, an associate professor of public policy at the University of Southern California and member of the Mackinac Center Board of Scholars, provided technical guidance.

Details of the survey can be seen at the Mackinac Center website.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.