News Story

District Disputes MEA President's Claim About School Funding Cuts

Steve Cook said Wayne-Westland lost $40 million under Gov. Snyder; administration official says district received more revenue

The Wayne County school district that the president of the Michigan Education Association highlighted as losing $40 million under Gov. Rick Snyder's watch has actually had its funding increase.

In a column for The Detroit News, MEA President Steve Cook wrote: "Take the Wayne-Westland school district, which has lost $40,465,325 during Snyder's tenure."

He went on to complain about what he claims are cuts to education and about corporations.

But it is unclear where he got his numbers, said Jenny Johnson, a spokeswoman for the Wayne-Westland Community School District.

"According to Deputy Superintendent/Administrative and Business Services Jim Larson-Shidler, the figure of $40,465,325 cannot be substantiated." she said. "In fact, if you included the MPSERS offset (Michigan Public School Employee Retirement System) Wayne-Westland has actually received a modest increase each year. Wayne-Westland's revenues have increased approximately $12,689,146 under the Snyder administration."

Cook, who writes a monthly column as part of a "Labor Voices" feature for The Detroit News, has made inaccurate statements about school funding in his columns in the past.

The MEA didn't respond to requests for comment.

Cook's most recent column made a number of claims about funding, but lacked context. For example, he wrote: "Here's a fact: Every single district in the state receives less money per pupil now than it did in 2010-11." 

Cook could have been referring to each district's foundation allowance, which is a per-pupil amount each district receives from the state, but is only part of the total funding the state gives each district.

For example, Wayne-Westland received $66.3 million from the state foundation allowance in 2013-14, but had another $18.6 million from the state, which was not included in the state foundation allowance. So Cook ignored 22 percent of the state money the district received.

The state money not included in the foundation allowance goes to cover things such as special education, adult education, school lunches and the state's contribution to employee retirement health care costs. The state paid $4.7 million of the Wayne-Westland district's costs involved with the Michigan Public School Employee Retirement System, a cost that Cook is not factoring in when he only looks at the foundation allowance.

State taxpayers are paying more per pupil today than they did three years ago, said Audrey Spalding, education policy director at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.

"He [Cook] is attempting to mislead voters," Spalding said.

In fact, many school districts are getting more money from the state than they did in 2010-11, when Jennifer Granholm was governor.

Livonia Public Schools Superintendent Randy Liepa has been quoted by the Detroit metro newspapers as well as TV stations about his concerns with state funding.

Livonia received about $584 more per student in 2013-14 than it did in 2010-11.

Even districts that are in deficit are receiving more money per pupil today than under then-Gov. Granholm.

Albion Public Schools, which recently closed its high school and sent its students to nearby Marshall High School, is getting about $412 more per pupil in 2013-14 than three years earlier.

~~~~~

See also:

Teacher Union President Continues Misrepresentation of School Aid Facts

Union President Blames State, School Officials For Problems At Buena Vista, Pontiac

MEA President Repeats 'Disingenuous' Claim About Teacher Pay

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

Commentary

Medicaid Expansion Studies Weren't Trustworthy

Analysis reveals multiple flaws

It may be water over the dam, but one report on the potential impact to employers if Michigan did not adopt the Obamacare Medicaid expansion has been exposed as being essentially bunk due to flagrant misuse or misrepresentation of the data it cited.

This is worth noting because the claims from Jackson Hewitt were widely cited by Republican lawmakers here who supported the expansion, and probably tilted others into that camp. Its conclusion was that "employers may pay substantially higher federal tax penalties under the ACA (Affordable Care Act) in states that do not expand Medicaid." Jackson Hewitt estimated Michigan employers would pay between $42 million and $63 million in penalties without the expansion.

Not so fast.

The Foundation for Government Accountability's Jonathan Ingram took a closer look at the Jackson Hewitt report and has just released a paper describing its shocking shortcomings. Here's the gist, as distilled by a useful daily digest produced by the National Center for Policy Analysis:

  • The reports do not estimate the number of full-time employees between 100 percent and 138 percent of the FPL (federal poverty line) correctly. Rather than look at state population data, the authors make an assumption about states' low-income population distribution, leading to wildly divergent numbers. For example, the studies estimate that more than twice as many people are in the 100 percent to 138 percent FPL group in Utah than there are in reality. These miscalculations lead to incorrect calculations of employer costs.
  • The studies include individuals who are already eligible for Medicaid without the state expansion (and who therefore could not trigger employer penalties) in their calculations.
  • Seasonal workers and part-year workers do not trigger penalties either. The Jackson Hewitt calculations, however, include these workers, who constitute one-third of full-time employees within the 100 percent to 138 percent FPL group. Again, this overestimates the potential employer cost.
  • Only 14 percent of full-time employees at large employers are not offered affordable health insurance, yet Jackson Hewitt assumes that 93 percent of employees are not offered affordable health insurance, triggering penalties.
  • The reports assume that employers will subject themselves to these penalties, rather than find ways to work around them. This is unlikely. Employers will restructure their workforce and reduce their workers to part-time work to avoid penalties.
  • The Jackson Hewitt study assumes that the employer mandate will be enforced as it was enacted in 2010, but given the frequency of delays, this is doubtful.

As all Americans have since learned, beware the promises (or warnings) of Obamacare supporters and apologists

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.