News Story

skimTRACKER 'Forced Unionization' Dues: More Than $34 Million Taken By The SEIU

skimTRACKER
AFTER SEVEN YEARS AND MORE THAN $34 MILLION TAKEN BY THE SEIU FROM MICHIGAN HOME HELP PROGRAM PROVIDERS, THE SKIM TRACKER HAS STOPPED BECAUSE THE UNION CONTRACT HAS ENDED AND WON'T BE RENEWED

ATTORNEY GENERAL ORDERED THE STATE TO STOP TAKING MONEY ON MAY 25, 2012
$34,416,335.21
Skimmed since November 2006
$9,393,039.58
Skimmed after reaching the MI Senate in June 2011
$4,823,050.44
Skimmed after the bill was signed April 10, 2012
$4,168,068.28
Skimmed after the Attorney General
opinion May 25, 2012

The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) "organized” Michigan's self-employed Home Help Program providers for the purpose of skimming dues from their ailing and disabled clients' Medicaid subsidy checks. The majority of these providers are relatives or friends taking care of loved ones. It’s been estimated that less than 25 percent of the providers are hired in an employment setting. 

The first counter tallied SEIU dues skimmed since the union and state officials first launched this scheme in late 2006. The second shows the amount skimmed since June 9, 2011, when the Michigan House passed and sent to the Senate a bill to ban this and all similar “stealth unionization” efforts. The third counter shows the dues skimmed since the governor signed the bill into law on April 10, 2012. The fourth counter shows the amount skimmed since May 25, 2012, when the Attorney General opinion was announced.
 
The contract between the SEIU and the dummy employer used to facilitate the scheme ended Feb. 28. 

For more information, visit:

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

News Story

Right-to-Work Inches Ahead in Indiana

A dispatch from Indianapolis

INDIANAPOLIS — Legislation that would make Indiana a right-to-work state moved to the floor of the state House here Tuesday after House Bill 1001 passed the House Employment, Labor and Pensions Committee on an 8-5 party line vote, with all Democrats opposing the legislation.

A vote on the bill by the full House is planned for the end of the week.

For the House side of the Indiana General Assembly, the committee hearing Tuesday morning was a catch-up event. Movement of the legislation had been delayed three days because Democrats stayed away to prevent action on the measure by denying a required quorum of at least 67 House members being present for a session. The Republicans control the chamber by a 60-40 margin.

The Democrats, however, who were facing fines of $1,000 per day each, decided to show up for work, ending their walk-out Monday, although Indiana House Democratic Leader Patrick Bauer has said he would not rule out future walk-outs aimed at stalling the legislation.

In the very brief hearing this morning, it took little time for the Democrats and Republicans to begin arguing. Republican Committee Chair Douglas Gutwein wouldn’t allow Democrats to offer amendments to the bill. When Democrats protested, Rep. Gutwein pointed out that if they had been in session last Friday they might have had a chance to amend the bill at that time. The entire hearing today lasted less than 10 minutes. It was not a harmonious gathering.

The Indiana Senate has already moved its version of the legislation, Senate Bill 269, to the Senate floor. House Bill 1001 is the House version of the legislation. Currently, the bills are the same. If the two versions end up differing, the track the legislation takes through the General Assembly would be slowed. As written, the legislation would make it a Class A misdemeanor to require an individual to join or remain in a union or to pay any dues, fees or other charges to that same labor organization

Michiganders have good reason to keep a watch over what is happening in the Hoosier State.

In terms of economic competition, right-to-work states fare better than those that haven't adopted the policy. What's more, this tendency has become more pronounced in an increasingly global marketplace. As the first right-to-work state in the industrial Midwest, Indiana’s economy might be expected to excel beyond the economies of its neighboring states. If that were to happen, pressure could mount on Michigan lawmakers to adopt a right-to-work law.

“I don't think it would make much difference immediately,” said Inside Michigan Politics Editor Bill Ballenger. “I mean, the Michigan Legislature isn't going to turn around and pass a right-to-work law just because Indiana does. But, does it pave the way to adoption of one in the future? It certainly could. The big question would be whether the Republicans can hang on to control of the House in the fall. If they do, then you might see them moving to do something on right-to-work the next year after that, or maybe in 2015 or 2016. Once we see a neighboring state adopt it, it could start a one-step-at-a-time situation that moves in that direction.”

It's believed that there might already be enough votes in the Michigan Legislature to pass such a measure. Meanwhile, Gov. Rick Snyder has said that he won't pursue RTW for Michigan as part of his agenda, but would sign an RTW bill if it reached his desk.

 

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.