News Story

Ten Facts About Government Pensions In Michigan

With all the charts you need to explain the problems

1. Michigan’s school retirement system has a $26.7 billion unfunded liability.

Officials estimate that to pay the benefits promised to current and future school retirees, there needs to be $67.7 billion invested in the pension fund right now. But persistent underfunding means the actual amount is just $41.0 billion for the Michigan Public Schools Employees Retirement System (MPSERS). This leaves the system only 60.5 percent funded — the largest shortfall since it began. Unfunded liabilities increased $9.1 billion over the past five years. The problem is not limited to schools, though: Pension funds at Michigan’s counties and 100 largest cities have a combined shortfall of $6.7 billion.

2. Annual required contributions (ARC) into school pensions have increased 85 percent since 2010.

The “ARC” is the minimum contribution needed each year to cover new pension promises and keep up with the state's plan to gradually catch up on past underfunding. It was $1.2 billion in 2010, but continued underfunding drove the figure up to $2.2 billion in 2015, which was also the sixth year in a row the state did not meet the requirement. (It actually paid in $1.97 billion.) Increased spending on pensions crowds out other state spending and pressures lawmakers to increase taxes.

3. For over a decade, Michigan has assumed school payrolls would increase by 3.5 percent per year, but it has decreased 18 percent in the past decade.

Determining how much needs to be invested in pension funds each year requires making certain assumptions about the future, and getting these wrong increases underfunding. One of the current assumptions is that school payrolls will grow, something that hasn't happened for years. In 2005, school payrolls totaled $10.2 billion; in 2015, payroll was down to $8.4 billion.

4. More than one-third (36 percent) of Michigan school payrolls are absorbed by the pension system.

Just five years ago, this percentage was between 19 and 21 percent, depending on when the employee was hired.

5. Only 13 percent of the expenses schools incur for employee pensions each year goes to pay benefits earned in that year. The rest goes to catching up on past underfunding.

This means that 87 percent goes toward catching up on unfunded liabilities — and it’s still not enough. As the chart below shows, catching up on underfunding crowds out spending on normal costs and health care costs. ("Normal costs" refers to the money needed to cover the obligations an employer incurred for its workers during the year.)

6. In 2000, the pension system consumed 12.2 percent of school payrolls, most of which covered new pension credits earned in that year. Today the system swallows 36 percent of payrolls.

Despite a 200 percent increase in pension contributions over 16 years, a far smaller portion of this money goes to cover benefits earned by active employees in the current year.

7. The average Michigan city has set aside just 69 percent of what’s needed to cover future pension benefits.

The pension funds of the state’s 100 largest cities and townships only hold 69 percent of what they should have to cover future benefits. That’s actually up from 67 percent in 2014. The slight increase may be associated with the fact that some cities have closed their defined benefit plan to new employees, who get 401(k) contributions instead. It might also be associated with enrolling new hires in a less generous defined benefit plan. These 100 cities combined owe $4.2 billion more than they have set aside.

8. Only one of the 100 largest cities with an open defined benefit plan is fully funded.

Of those that are still enrolling new employees in a defined benefit system among Michigan’s 100 largest cities, Michigan Capitol Confidential found that only Kalamazoo has a fully funded plan. Another 19 cities are fully funded but they have closed their benefit plans to new hires. Only two of 83 Michigan counties are fully funded — Bay and Kalamazoo. Both of these counties have defined benefit plans.

9. The average Michigan county has just 76 percent of the amount needed in its pension fund.

This is up 2 percentage points from 2014, when they were just 74 percent funded, on average. A number of counties have recently closed their defined benefit plan to new hires, which helps limit the increase in unfunded liabilities. Altogether, pension funds in Michigan’s 83 counties are $2.5 billion short of the amount they should have to pay their promises to retirees.

10. Ten counties have closed their defined benefit plan and are 94 percent funded.

The prudent actions of leaders in these 10 counties have contributed to their taxpayers being on the hook for far less in unfunded liabilities than they might have been. Macomb has the second-largest county workforce in the state (5,145) and closed its defined benefit plan to new hires in 2015. Genesee will complete its shift to defined contribution plans by November 20, 2017. Many smaller counties are making a shift as well.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

Commentary

Honest Education Discussion Requires Counting All the Dollars

Michigan should spend smarter before spending more

Though the evidence for Michigan spending its way to educational success continues to disappoint, its champions have turned to misdirection and misinformation to keep pressing their cause forward.

The release of the $400,000 Michigan Education Finance Study (better known as the adequacy study) was far more of an early summer flop than a box office hit. As Detroit Free Press editorial page editor Stephen Henderson laments, the study “landed with the force of a feather on desks in Lansing.” His call for the adequacy study to start “a bigger conversation” about school funding was echoed a few days later in a Free Press column written by education professors Michael Addonizio and David Arsen.

Where the Henderson column begins, the Addonizio and Arsen one ends: seeking to dismantle the straw man argument that “money doesn’t matter in education.” Ironically, both columns treat some education money as if it doesn’t matter.

The education professors fixed their sights on a subset of education dollars to sustain the claim that Michigan’s per-pupil funding hasn’t kept pace with inflation. But their analysis leaves out more than $1.6 billion school districts collect in non-general fund revenue and nearly $2.6 billion in intermediate school district revenue. As a result, their calculations miss the fact that the state’s funding has inched back ahead of pre-recession levels.

Addonizio and Arsen also assert that the adequacy study’s prescription of $8,667 to properly educate a typical non-low-income general education student is based on the record of districts that operate “efficiently.” Yet they omit that the adequacy study found 19 of its 54 “notably successful” districts spend on average 10 percent less than the recommended amount.

Less clear is precisely what Henderson omitted in his claim that $8,667 is “more than we spend right now in Detroit, in many other urban districts and in most rural ones.” Official government data show that DPS’s 2014-15 operating expenditure was just over $16,000 per student.

The Free Press editor acknowledges as a “flaw” in the study the observation that more money would offer only a “slow-going means of improvement.” Each additional $1,000 per student, according to the study, would increase math and reading achievement by 1 percent. That means funding would have to be more than doubled to make sure one-third of Michigan’s 11th-graders reach proficiency in math.

Michigan starts out way behind academically, and already rates as one of the nation’s top education spenders. Education Week’s apples-to-apples comparison places Michigan at 43rd in math and reading achievement among the 50 states.

Stanford University’s Eric Hanushek has found most academic studies find little or no statistical connection between spending and results. Our own multiyear, building-level study found no match between additional dollars and better results on 27 of 28 different measures of academic achievement.

It’s not that money doesn’t matter in education. How resources are used can make a tremendous difference. Yet without dramatic changes to the education system, most new money will not be spent in meaningful ways.

But serious conversations about how dollars are spent must begin with a clearer understanding of current funding levels.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.