MichiganVotes Bills

Michigan bill revives film subsidies, adds cash giveaway for touting state in commercials

Film subsidies failed to have a lasting impact the first time around

Michigan lawmakers once created and later ended a program to subsidize companies that make films in the state. A new set of lawmakers is considering plans to revive the subsidies, which could include 35% of the cost of hiring certain workers.

Senate Bill 438 was introduced June 28 by Sen. Dayna Polehanki, D-Livonia. The legislation would give producers a transferable tax credit worth 25% of what they spend in Michigan on certain services and supplies. A producer can receive another 5% for including specific branding references in its product. These references include "filmed in Michigan," "Pure Michigan," "Michigan Film & Digital Media Office," and the Michigan Film Industry Association logo.

Producers can claim a credit for the money they spend on personnel for the next ten years — 20% for hiring nonresidents and 30% for hiring state residents. Producers can get a 5% bonus for buying from businesses owned by women, minorities, people with disabilities or veterans. They also can get 5% for their personnel expenses for hiring minorities, people with disabilities or veterans.

If, for example, the film company has expenses of $100 million, the state will issue a transferable tax credit amounting to 25%, or $25 million.

The legislation allows producers to sell their tax credits to other taxpayers. When a business that holds a tax credit sells it to someone else, it usually does so for less than its full value. The business can then receive a direct cash payment, while the state treasury collects less than it otherwise would.

Producers can claim a credit for purchases from Michigan-based vendors for tangible property and services directly related to their projects. These purchases exclude assets with residual value, as well as durable items. Examples of what the legislation calls “qualified production expenditures” eligible for the credit include facility rentals, transportation expenses within the state and insurance policies purchased from in-state agents. They also include postproduction expenses such as animation, editing, sound recording and visual effects.

Producers might choose to sell their tax credits instead of using them, if their financial situation calls for it. Film productions often require significant amounts of money right away, and selling tax credits allows producers to access much-needed funds quickly.

While Michigan is one of the few states without an active film incentive program, it had one in the past. The program cost taxpayers $500 million during its lifetime. The number of film production jobs increased by fewer than 2,000, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

“A rising tide lifts all boats,” said Michael LaFaive, the Mackinac Center’s senior director of fiscal policy. “Rather than try to subsidize what politicians think should be Michigan’s next big industry, they should create an attractive environment for all and let the economy take care of itself.

“The market has been creating jobs long before government started rolling out fiscal favors,” LaFaive added. “Brands like Kellogg’s and Motown Records were not born of taxpayer subsidies, but from entrepreneurs who thought their own investments might produce a return.”

The bill is now in the Senate Committee on Economic and Community Development.

Will Young is a Michigan Capitol Confidential intern.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

Commentary

Southfield ballot question pits democracy against technocracy

Proposals to amend city charter stem from a belief that democracy is too messy. It isn’t.

In November, voters in the Oakland County community of Southfield will face two ballot questions that define our time: Should the city clerk and city treasurer positions, respectively, remain elected, or be appointed?

Which is to say: Should the people of Southfield choose their clerk and treasurer, or should the city administrator choose?

“Whenever I’m in doubt, I prefer elected rulers over unelected ones,” Mackinac Center President Joseph G. Lehman told CapCon. “At any level of government.”

“Of the 276 other Michigan cities with charters,” explains the city’s fact sheet on the ballot proposals, “only 42 elect these positions with the remaining 234 being appointed.”

Bringing Southfield in line with the herd means departing from local tradition.

Under the current system, the people choose. But they only get to choose on Election Day. If performance dips or behavior is egregious, voters can wait another four years to replace the person, push for a recall, or ask Gov. Gretchen Whitmer to remove them. 

Their power comes from the people, not the mayor’s office. Outside of Election Day, only the governor or a voter recall can remove them from office.

That Southfield has a city administrator, in addition to an elected mayor, means the city has already moved in the direction of technocracy. That is, rule by the super-competent, preferably a level removed from the people. This carries an assumption that city administrators can do what mayors cannot. And that assumption is faulty.

The ballot proposals stem from a belief that democracy is too messy.

Of course Michigan cities and counties have elected bad clerks and treasurers before. Just as city councils have hired bad city administrators, and those city administrators have hired bad clerks and treasurers before.

People are people are people. That means they make mistakes. That means they can mislead and be misled. Whether elected or appointed, it’s not unheard of for someone to present a competent face to land a job, then fall apart when it’s time to work.

There is no scenario where the people of Southfield can be assured of the future. But there’s only one scenario where the people get to choose their leaders.

James David Dickson is managing editor of Michigan Capitol Confidential. Email him at dickson@mackinac.org.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.