A number of advocates for more state funding for K-12 public education are making claims about cuts, but they're ignoring $2 billion in additional state education funding, which is as much as 30 percent of state funding for some school districts.

The $2 billion is not a part of the state foundation allowance.

Overall, 20 percent of state spending on education is spent via "categorical grants," which is money districts receive in addition to their foundation allowance. 

Outside of the foundation allowance, the state gives school districts money for special education, adult education, school lunch and then helps in offsetting the increasing cost of school employees' pensions.

When Gov. Rick Snyder said the state was putting more money into public educations, many school district officials and union leaders responded by talking about the much publicized per-pupil foundation allowance, which comes from state and local sources and is tied to student head counts.

"I think that he put out statements and numbers that were unbelievable," David Hecker, president of the American Federation of Teachers-Michigan said in the Detroit Free Press about the governor's state of the state speech. "I don't know how he could stand there and claim he increased funding $660 per student, when we know he slashed funding $470."

The AFT represents teachers in the Detroit Public Schools.

Only $243.79 million of the state funding for Detroit Public Schools was from the state foundation allowance. The state gave a total of $348.3 million to Detroit Public Schools.

"Critics aren't telling the whole story," said Audrey Spalding, director of education policy for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. "State taxpayers have contributed billions more."

But the drumbeat about inadequate funding continues.

Godfrey-Lee Public Schools Superintendent David Britten said Jan. 20 on his Twitter account: "Governor Snyder Deceived You On School Funding. Here is How." Britten then linked to a website that showed per-pupil foundation allowance figures.

Godfrey-Lee's per-student funding from local and state sources was $7,474 per student in 2010-11. It dropped to $7,004 per student in 2011-12 and 2012-13 and then increased to $7,064 in 2013-14, according to state aid financial status reports. That is the money the district uses to pay such things as teacher salaries and benefits, and classroom expenditures.

The Kent County school district received $12.35 million in state foundation allowance in 2013-14, which accounted for 85 percent of the school district's total state funding of $14.51 million.

Godfrey-Lee also received about $605,000 to help pay for its school employees' retirement costs, which was not part of the $12.35 million in state foundation allowance.

“That's fine as long as you differentiate between funds available for educating all students in all subject areas, which primarily come in the form of the shrinking foundation allowance, and those dedicated to things like fixing the MPSERs (retirement system) mess solely created by state policies and then dumped on schools to fix," Britten said in an email. "To cite it any other way is simply misinformation."

Total funding for K-12 in Michigan, adjusted for inflation, increased substantially from 1970-2000 and has remained steady since then.

Consumers Energy has consistently expressed its desire to be a "good neighbor." But when Mason County found that Lake Winds Energy Plant was too noisy, Consumers Energy took the issue to the courts.

Earlier this month, Consumers Energy (CMS) asked the 51st Circuit Court to overrule Mason County’s finding that the Lake Winds industrial wind plant, a 56-turbine facility south of Ludington, is not in compliance with the County’s noise ordinance. In addition, the utility is asking the court to halt efforts by Mason County to enforce its interpretation of the ordinance.

Kevon Martis, director of the Interstate Informed Citizens Coalition (IICC), said that for multiple reasons the Mason County wind turbine noise dispute is worth keeping an eye on.

"CMS's Energy’s Lake Winds Plant is the first in the state to be declared out of compliance with a wind turbine noise ordinance," Martis said. "It is remarkable that the same planning board that once approved this project now unanimously declared it to be out of compliance with noise guidelines that they had previously adopted as a direct result of intimate negotiations with CMS. The Mason County noise guidelines were essentially dictated to the Planning Commission by CMS agents."

The case pits alleged health and safety concerns against the potential economic viability of the $250 million industrial wind plant. Putting the wind plant in compliance with the county's interpretation of its noise ordinance likely would force CMS to lower the decibel levels on the turbines, which in turn could significantly reduce their efficiency.

"Unlike other power generators, the only means of mitigating wind turbine noise is by increasing the distance from the turbine to homes or to reduce the power output of the turbines themselves," Martis said. "Our review of the noise study shows that the turbines exceed the county noise limits at roughly 30 percent output. If the courts order CMS to curtail their output to such levels, as justice would demand, the price of energy from that project will rise substantially."

With so much at stake, if the 51^st Circuit Court ultimately upholds the Mason County finding, CMS might be expected to take the issue on to the Michigan Court of Appeals.

For CMS, Lake Winds was its first wind energy project and is part of the utility’s effort to meet Michigan’s 10 percent energy mandate. Under the mandate, 10 percent of Michigan’s energy is supposed to be produced by in-state renewable sources by 2015. The mandate was supposed to be aimed at reducing carbon emissions; however the law did not require emissions be monitored to measure the mandate’s actual impact. 

The renewable energy mandate was one of two key provisions of the 2008 Energy Bill. Under the other key provision, competition within the state’s electricity market was capped at 10 percent, giving the state’s two largest electric utilities — CMS and Detroit Edison (DTE) — quasi-monopoly status.

In May 2011, before the turbines were up and running, CMS announced a $2 million "Good Neighbor Fund," which was to provide resources to address possible issues residents living close to the wind plant might have. But soon after the Lake Winds began operating, serious issues arose that apparently went beyond what the utility had anticipated.

On April 1, area residents filed a lawsuit claiming noise, vibrations and flickering lights generated by the wind plant were adversely impacting their health. Dizziness, sleeplessness and headaches are among the symptoms noted in the lawsuit.

Then in September, the Mason County Planning Commission determined that the wind plant is not in compliance with safety guidelines. CMS then appealed that decision to the Mason County Zoning Board of Appeals. In December, the County Zoning Board of Appeals upheld the planning commission's decision.

"CMS lost at the Zoning Board of Appeals and now they head to court to litigate the matter," Martis said. "In the meantime, the noisy turbines continue to drive Mason County residents to seek refuge from the noise by bunkering in their basements or fleeing to sleeping quarters outside the development."

Brian Wheeler, spokesman for CMS, did not respond to a request for comment.