Having Won Once, Reformers Want Even-Year Grand Rapids Elections
One official says their lower turnout makes odd-year elections look like suppression
A citizen-led group in Grand Rapids is hoping to persuade the city commission to switch municipal elections from odd years to even ones.
Rina Baker and Bonnie Burke hope the efforts of their organization, Empower the Citizen, will convince city commissioners to move city council and mayoral elections to even-numbered years, when turnout tends to be higher.
If city commissioners aren’t interested, Baker said, she is willing to take the issue directly to the people by starting a ballot initiative campaign. In 2014, Baker led a successful effort to limit the city’s mayor and commissioners to two four-year terms.
“I would like to have the commission do the right thing,” Baker said. “Then if they don’t, we’ll press, press, press, and then if we have to, we’ll run a ballot initiative.”
Holding votes on dates that aren’t aligned with even-year congressional elections — such as Grand Rapids’ mayoral and city commissioner elections in November 2019 — are sometimes called “stealth elections.”
After reformers made several failed earlier attempts to streamline Michigan election dates, a comprehensive election consolidation law was enacted in 2003 by one of the first legislatures subject to term limits. It required nearly all elections in the state to be held on one of four days in the year, later reduced to one of three days: The first Tuesday after the first Monday in the months of May, August and November. But the reform did not say that all elections had to be in even-numbered years.
For Baker, the biggest reason to have elections then is to increase voter turnout.
According to election data she collected from Grand Rapids, voter participation in some areas was as much as 40 percentage points higher in 2016 than it was in 2017. For example, turnout in some precincts in the 3rd Ward, which covers much of the southern portion of the city, was 45.7 percent in 2016 but only 5.7 percent in 2017. Data from the 1st Ward, which covers the western side of the city, shows a nearly identical pattern.
Baker also said that holding the city elections on even years will save money.
Ruth Kelly, one of two commissioners from the 2nd Ward, said a couple of commissioners don’t think holding local elections on even years would be a good thing. Kelly said the commission should have time to research the potential pros and cons of the proposal.
“Switching to even-year elections does increase minority turnout,” Kelly said. “But it will cost more to get the word [about your campaign] out and you’d also be running in a partisan election time, making the election more partisan.”
Positions in the Grand Rapids local government are officially nonpartisan.
José Flores, who serves as a board member of Grand Rapids Public Schools, believes that holding elections on odd-numbered years is an effort by power brokers in the city to quietly suppress minority turnout at the polls.
“We need a city commission that reflects the community. We have a racial and an ethnic community that is currently being underserved,” Flores said.
Steve Guitar, Grand Rapids media relations manager, said the city commission has not officially taken up the election-year issue.
State Rep. Thomas Albert, R-Lowell, sponsored House Bill 4814 in 2017 to require all elections involving proposed property tax increases to be held in November. Albert said that’s when more people vote.
“Voter turnout is historically roughly 30 percent in August and 20 percent in May elections,” Albert said in a 2017 press release. “We should have a goal of maximum voter turnout when ballot questions impact a voter’s tax bill. Voter turnout is clearly highest during November elections.”
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
The Free-Market Case for a Clean Slate
Clean-slate laws help people reintegrate into the workforce
Editor's note: This article originally appeared in The Hill on January 18, 2019.
It’s said that the punishment ought to fit the crime, but that adage is coming undone now that having a criminal record has become a lifelong sentence for millions of Americans. One reason: Technology has made it easier than ever to access public records. As a result, individuals whose crimes were minor, are decades old, or both, nevertheless face a stigma that could harm their employment and education prospects until they die. This is bad for public safety and for the workforce, but a simple policy change could correct the problem.
Clean-slate laws aim to clear one or more items from the criminal history of former offenders who have earned that opportunity after years of law-abiding living. Many states’ laws contain provisions that allow eligible individuals (i.e., those whose crimes were minor and who have been law-abiding for many years) to apply for this privilege. But these laws require applicants to navigate the complexities of the legal system with the help of a lawyer. States add to the challenge by charging steep administrative fees, which they sometimes raise to generate more revenue.
The solution is to automatically seal the relevant records as soon as former offenders have met their state’s record-clearing law, at no cost to them. This simple change promises significant benefits. First, it eliminates the gap between eligible individuals with the time and means to navigate the legal system and those without.
Second, it could mean a massive boom for the workforce. Studies conducted in Michigan and California indicate that record-sealing was associated with “a significant increase in employment and average wages” and a low recidivism rate. Yet few former offenders who have earned a second chance are able to access it. In Michigan, more than 95 percent of eligible individuals did not manage to clear their records within 5 years of meeting the requirements to do so. Automating the process could give people access to a better job, which could reduce recidivism, strengthen families and boost the economy.
Finally, clean-slate legislation bolsters public safety coming and going. Initially, it gives individuals incentives to abide by the law so they may become eligible for record-clearing. Later, that second chance may generate better employment opportunities that make it easier to remain law-abiding.
While some may object that criminal records are public for a reason, it’s important to remember that the priority of clean-slate legislation is simply to ensure that people who have earned the legal privilege of record-clearing can use it. Putting former offenders in the best possible position to obtain housing, employment and education is good for public safety and great for states struggling to fill talent gaps in their workforce.
For all these reasons, the policy enjoys broad bipartisan support. Late last year, 25 groups from across the political spectrum announced their support for a nationwide campaign to enact clean slate in as many states as possible. The coalition includes the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (the charitable organization founded by Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan), Koch Industries, the Center for American Progress and more.
States looking to enact clean-slate legislation can look to Pennsylvania, where the state’s General Assembly recently passed a version of this measure nearly unanimously. Digital court records made it easy for anyone to retrieve individual criminal histories, and the expungement process made it difficult for deserving former offenders to have their records sealed. The primary beneficiaries of clean-slate laws, advocates say, are employees with minor, nonviolent convictions from 20 or 30 years ago who can’t pass a background check to this day.
If an offense is eligible to be sealed and law enforcement signs off, it will become accessible only by police and court personnel, and employers required by federal law to consider those records. The offender no longer will be required to disclose it to members of the general public.
The change merely means that a former offender no longer has to obtain the privilege in court with the help of an attorney; it will, instead, come automatically to former offenders who meet the standards specified in law.
It’s estimated that as many as 1 in 3 Americans has some kind of criminal record. Clean-slate legislation offers the opportunity to uphold the spirit of the law by ensuring that a minor conviction isn’t a lifelong sentence, and that record-clearing is available to anyone who has earned it, rich or poor. It is a practical measure that will help well-meaning Americans get back to work, where they can help contribute to the safety and prosperity of our entire nation.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Follow us on social media!
Push back on big government “solutions” by becominga fan of us on Facebook and X. Plus you can share free-market news to your network!
Facebook
I already follow CapCon!
More From CapCon