State Partially Rolls Back Utility’s Rate Increase, Company Heralds Declining Bills
DTE’s customers now pay more than they did in the fall, though not quite as much
In an April 24 post, DTE energy claims its residential electric customers are seeing their bills “decline while infrastructure investments are increasing.” In reality, customers of the electric and natural gas utility are paying higher electric rates now than they were last October.
In a blog post on its website, DTE claims the average residential customer should see his or her electric bill decrease by about 2 percent between April and May of this year. DTE also projects that the recent federal corporate tax cut will allow it to reduce customer gas and electric rates by about 3 percent in the fall.
The reason DTE can claim electric bills went down is that the state agency that regulates Michigan utilities trimmed the rate hike it requested last October, taking it from $125 million to $65 million. Under previous Michigan law, when DTE requested a rate hike, it could begin collecting the higher amount after six months. But if the Michigan Public Service Commission denies all or part of the increase, the company must give the money back through credits. Under new law, utilities are no longer allowed to self-implement.
That is what happened with DTE’s October 2017 request. Under the commission’s ruling, as of May 1, 2018, DTE was required to dial back the higher rates it had been collecting from November 2017 through the end of April and refund the excess to customers.
So while DTE’s residential electricity customers are paying higher rates than they were last October, the firm is claiming they got a rate cut.
Electricity “rates” and “bills” are not interchangeable terms. Rates refer to the price a customer pays for a kilowatt-hour of electricity. Bills, by contrast include the amount charged for the number of kilowatt hours used plus other costs, such as levies imposed by the state to subsidize electricty use by low-income people and promote energy efficiency and renewable sources.
According to a document sent to Michigan Capitol Confidential from DTE Energy, the average rate being charged for residential electricity was 16.3 cents per kilowatt-hour in January. Under the commission’s order, that rate was dropped back to 16.1 cents per kilowatt-hour in May.
The average rate paid by residential customers for a kilowatt-hour has increased from 12.5 cents in 2010 to 15.2 cents in 2016, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Those numbers reflect the average of all the electricity prices charged to residential customers by all the state’s utilities.
Randi Berris, a corporate communications manager at DTE, defended the company’s blog post, saying the claim that bills went down on a month-to-month basis is factual.
“The Empowering Michigan blog’s purpose is to simply point out that bills are dropping while infrastructure upgrades are increasing,” Berris said in an email.
Jason Hayes, the director of environmental policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, called DTE’s claim of lowering electricity bills a clever word game.
“These utilities expect that we will hear our bills are decreasing and feel good about saving money. But, the reality is that Michigan residents pay electric rates that are higher than any other Great Lakes state, and higher than the national average,” Hayes said. “So, how is it possible to pay higher rates, but have declining bills? Both DTE and Consumers Energy confuse the issue by saying that Michigan residents use less overall electricity each month than residents of other states, ergo our final bill is less.”
Correction: The story was updated to note that under old Michigan law, a utility had to wait six month before it could self-implement a rate increase.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Kayak Tax Proponents Try to Disguise Cash Grab as Safety Measure
Adding onerous education requirements should not make tax more palatable
Last fall, some Michigan sheriffs began calling for a new tax on nonmotorized watercraft like kayaks, canoes and paddleboards. They say that requiring Michiganders to register these boats will generate needed revenue. Although both the House and Senate have passed resolutions opposing the “kayak tax,” some proponents of the tax haven’t given up on getting it passed.
Detroit News columnist Daniel Howes describes how to overcome this apparent defeat by using a different tack: “the tax-the-paddlers crowd might have a more compelling argument if the proceeds from the registration fees were earmarked for safety training.” Howes cites the argument that if motorboat operators must take safety courses, paddlers should be required to do the same.
But not all motorboat operators have to take safety courses in Michigan. Anyone born before July 1, 1996, can legally drive a motorboat without completing any mandatory safety course. And for “personal watercraft” — jet skis, waverunners and the like — a boating safety certificate is only required for people born after 1978. Howes is essentially proposing creating stricter regulations for paddling a kayak than for flying around in a 300-horsepower Four Winns.
Further, requiring paddlers to obtain a boater safety certificate would put Michigan in a class of its own. While about half the states require a boater safety course for some operators of motorboats or sailboats, according to U.S. Coast Guard, no state requires a boater safety certification for the operation of paddle craft.
Attempting to recast this naked cash grab as a public health and safety measure is misguided. If there really is a problem with funding Michigan’s water-related infrastructure or first-response teams, it certainly won’t be resolved by creating a new and totally unprecedented tax on the more than 600,000 people just trying to enjoy Michigan’s great outdoors. Kayak tax proponents should seek other avenues for identifying and remedying alleged funding shortfalls.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
More From CapCon