News Bite

Solar panels have a carbon emissions problem

It takes them much longer than reported to become carbon neutral

Solar panels could take three times as long as previously reported to become carbon neutral, according to a July 2 report from Environmental Progress, a pro-nuclear activist group.

Per the July 2 report, titled “Solar Panels Are Three Times More Carbon-Intensive Than International Panel on Climate Change Claims”:

The IEA (International Energy Agency) has admitted to Environmental Progress that its carbon footprint calculations do not account for three important factors in (global solar photovoltaic) production: silicon mining; toxic panel waste, which promises to overwhelm recycling infrastructure; and something known as the albedo effect. This is when the highly reflective properties of dark-coloured solar panels lead to an increase in the greenhouse effect.

According to the IEA, when taken into proper account, the first two factors alone could more than triple the “payback period” for panels, i.e. the length of time before they become carbon neutral after installation.

Meanwhile in Michigan, Senate Bill 271 would require the state to operate on 100% renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, by 2035. The bill is currently in the Senate Committee on Energy and Environment. But even without a legal mandate, Michigan’s energy suppliers are accelerating plans to dismantle today’s approach to generating energy.

Despite the recent warning to lawmakers from DTE Energy CEO Jerry Norcia that “sometimes you can’t count on” wind and solar, the energy monopoly announced this month that it would retire its final coal-fired plant in 2032, three years ahead of schedule.

“There’s no obvious recognition from the governor’s office that wind and solar are wholly dependent on the weather,” Jason Hayes, the Mackinac Center’s director of energy and environmental policy, wrote in The Wall Street Journal in 2022. “They must have ample back-up from nuclear, coal and gas-fired plants for the significant amount of time on cloudy, windless days when turbines and solar panels produce nothing. Yet it’s the reliable energy sources that are being targeted for closure today.”

The Environmental Progress report describes energy policy in Western nations as “captured.”

“A picture emerges of an aspirational Western industry captured lock, stock and barrel by secretive, coal-loving Beijing,” concludes the report, which notes China’s key role in producing solar panels. “It’s a worry for the West’s economic development, never mind energy security and climate action. If solar is anything to go by, the great transition seems less based on data, than a mixture of blind faith and vested interests.”

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

Washington Watch

Congressional panels investigate Ford’s ties to Chinese company

Committe chairs claim ‘significant portion’ of BlueOval Battery Park jobs will be filled by workers brought from China

The leaders of two U.S. House committees sent a letter last week to Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley, announcing an investigation into the Dearborn automaker’s plans to work with a Chinese company as it develops a facility near Marshall, Michigan, for electric vehicle batteries. Their concerns include the possible importation of foreign labor to work at the plant and the Chinese company’s ownership of companies “allegedly connected to forced labor practices.”

The five-page letter, dated July 20, was penned by Reps. Mike Gallagher, R-Wisconsin; and Jason Smith, R-Missouri. Gallagher chairs the House Select Committee on China, while Smith chairs the House Ways and Means Committee. The Marshall-area project involves Ford and Contemporary Amperex Technology, Co. Limited, or CATL.

“[I]nformation regarding the proposed partnership agreement between Ford and CATL suggests that a significant portion of these well-paying jobs will be given to citizens of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) — not Americans,” Gallagher and Smith wrote.

The representatives wrote that several hundred of the 2,500 jobs promised will be given to CATL employees from China, “who will be in charge of setting up and maintaining the equipment.” The Chinese workers will be on-site through at least 2038, Gallagher and Smith wrote.

They attribute the use of foreign workers to “a deliberate choice by Ford.”

The lawmakers worry that Ford will take a technological back seat to the Chinese company.

“Rather than developing American technology, we are concerned that the deal could simply facilitate the partial onshoring of PRC-controlled battery technology, raw materials, and employees while collecting tax credits and flowing funds back to CATL through the licensing agreement,” Gallagher and Smith wrote.

They added: “If Ford is using a licensing agreement to maximize benefits to itself or CATL at the expense of the U.S. taxpayer, this demonstrates a disregard for corporate responsibility as an American company.”

The lawmakers are also concerned with mineral sourcing, where China has an advantage. They argue that Ford should pursue “the development of homegrown process technologies and local sourcing strategies.”

The letter sets an Aug. 10 deadline for Ford to respond to six questions, including how many Chinese workers will be brought to Marshall. The lawmakers also ask Ford for copies of relevant documents.

Thus far, taxpayers are committed to spend more than $1.5 billion toward the $3.5 billion project.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.