A Traverse City-area parent alleges that her local school district is not being forthright with parents when it encounters students who say they are in a gender-fluid situation. She cites as evidence materials taken from a high school foreign language class.

Sally Roeser says that a teacher in the Traverse City Area Public Schools used an icebreaker document that suggests the teacher’s willingness to conceal information from parents. Roeser is angry and wants other parents to know about it.

The document Roesser cites, meant to introduce students to their teacher, allegedly came from a German class at Traverse City West Senior High School. It asks for the student’s preferred name. A follow-up question asks the conditions under which the teacher may use that name. “May I use this name when I contact parents/guardians?” The document gives the student who answers ‘no’ the chance to tell the teacher what name should be used in front of parents.

The document also asks students which pronouns the teacher should use: he/him, she/her, they/them, or other. It also asks if the student will grant the teacher permission to use that pronoun in front of his or her parents, and if not, which pronoun the teacher should use.

“A teacher who has never met the parents and known our children for four days is soliciting personal information from them and asking the children if they want her to keep that a secret from their parents. That is a serious cause for alarm for any parents,” says Roeser.

Roeser says that after she learned of the form, she contacted Claudia Riedy, the classroom teacher who used the form. Roeser told Michigan Capitol Confidential she asked Riedy to read the form to her, word-for-word, over the telephone. Riedy, she says, would only paraphrase the document, and said it would be best to meet in person. Roeser refused to do that and obtained a copy from Joe Epser, the high school principal.

She then met in person with the teacher and principal. According to Roeser, she asked for an apology or admission that Reidy was wrong in distributing the form. Esper told the teacher she did not have to respond, according to Roeser, who told CapCon the discussion was futile.

Roeser says she tried to write a post on the topic to the district’s page on Facebook and was refused. Justin Van Rheenen, a content moderator for the page who is running for the district’s school board, told Michigan Capitol Confidential in a Facebook message:

As I have said to Sally many times, there is a team of people looking the post. We have asked for more information regarding the pervasiveness of the matter within the district. An isolated incident that has been addressed has not risen to the level of needing to bring the matter to the TCAPS Transparency community.

Individual grievances are best handled by going to the teacher, principal, and superintendent. As I’ve discussed with Sally, more evidence is needed to address this publicly on the page. I’ve encouraged her to place this on her personal profile and investigate the matter further. This is not an out of the ordinary request for our group.

The Traverse City Area School District did not respond to a request for comment.

The idea that teachers should sometimes not tell parents that their children want to go by a new name or pronoun is not limited to a class in Traverse City. Rather, it is found in high levels of government, including the Michigan Department of Education.

In a training video from the Michigan Department of Education, trainers tell educators they should keep a student’s sexual identity, preferred name, and preferred pronouns confidential unless the student permission. The video also trains teacher in how they can help with a child’s sexual transition, which may include keeping the information from parents.

State Superintendent Michael Rice recently told Bridge Michigan he stands by the Education Department’s guidance, saying it might be necessary to protect some children from abusive parents.

Tricia Foster, chief operating officer in Whitmer’s cabinet, sent a letter to the department, according to The Detroit News. In it, Foster said that the department needs to bring parents’ perspective into its work, adding that it should focus on reading, writing and math. She said, “Knowing we all seek those common goals, the recent teacher training video that went outside of that scope was concerning.” Foster continued, “We urge you to review your trainings to ensure they comply with all applicable regulations, maintain department guidelines, and are reflective of best practices.”

First there was “global warming,” and then there was “climate change.” But a new term is gaining currency, and it is “global weirding,” which in the words of one professor at Northeastern University, refers to extreme weather events. New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman popularized the term in a 2020 opinion piece, writing, “The hots are expected to get hotter, the wets wetter, the dries drier and the most violent storms more numerous.” When it comes to Michigan, says the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Michigan’s wildest temperatures happened almost 100 year ago.

NBC News used hot weather and wild fires in California and 60-degree weather and mosquitoes in Washington, D.C. in December as examples of global weirding. But The Mercury News of San Jose reported in 2014 that the area now known as California once had a 240-year drought and, 50 years later, another drought of 180 years. On the other side of the continent, Washington, D.C., experienced its coldest weather on Jan. 1, 1881, when the temperature reached 14 below zero, according to Extreme Weather Watch.

The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services appears to endorse the view of global weirding. It says that changes in the world are “leading to shifting seasonal patterns and more extreme events. Current climate forecasts show extreme weather patterns will increase through the 21st Century.” The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration that the highest recorded temperature in Michigan was 112 degrees, reached in 1936. The coldest temperature recorded was 51 below zero, recorded in 1934.

Jason Hayes is the environmental policy director at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. He takes a more sanguine look than some at recent weather observations.

“As with many other environmental issues, NOAA’s extreme temperature database demonstrates that cycles are normal in the natural world. Michigan’s minimum temperature record was set in 1934 and, only two years later, the maximum temperature record was set. We recently saw a similar issue in 2020, when media reports of rising water levels in the Great Lakes struck fear into the hearts of readers, but they didn’t bother to report that water levels in the lakes were just as high or higher in 1860, 1876, 1886, 1952, 1973, 1974, and 1986.”

Hayes continued: “Current headlines scream that the temperatures we’re experiencing in Michigan are unprecedented or dangerous. But the data show that we have seen extreme temperatures and extreme temperature swings in the past, and well before people were driving SUVs. Recognizing the fact that cycles are normal, it’s time for scientists and science to return their focus to data and to stop treating models as more real than reality.”