A debate over a recently enacted ban on some short-term housing rentals is roiling New Buffalo, a town on Lake Michigan. The issue came to a head last year at an Oct. 4 city council meeting.

Laura Murray is a homeowner who spoke against the ban at that meeting. She says she was kicked out at the order of Mayor John Humphrey after mentioning him in her comments.

A report on the meeting by local law enforcement officials does not match what is seen on a video of the event.

The video shows Murray reading from a written statement. When she mentions Humphrey, he gavels her down and says she is not allowed to mention him by name. Murray continues with her public comment, mentioning “the mayor.” Humphrey tells a police officer in attendance to remove Murray from the meeting, saying she is out of order for challenging him.

Murray appears even-toned in her comments, with a minor inflection at times. She leaves without incident when approached by the officer. Murray does raise her voice slightly as she continues to read her statement while walking out.

The police report characterized Murray as engaging in disorderly conduct and yelling.

Michigan Capitol Confidential obtained a copy of the report, written by officer Nathanial Voytovick, under a Freedom of Information Act request. The report has one section labeled “disorderly conduct.” That part of the report says Murray began “raising her voice” and singled out members of the city council. It says she “continued yelling and speaking in a loud tone” until the mayor ordered her removal lest she “continue to create disturbances.”

The report says Voytovick was assisted by Sergeant Russell Tillery and Police Chief Richard Killips. It adds that Murray left the building on her own but she “continued yelling” as she did so.

Humphrey and the New Buffalo City Police Department did not respond to emailed requests for comment.

Lansing’s public bus system is offering free rides to anyone who wants to vote on a Lansing School District debt proposal on May 3. The Capital Area Transportation Authority will offer free rides, systemwide and with no ID is required. “Riders should simply inform the driver that they wish to vote in order to board,” the transit agency states.

Some election experts question whether this is a form of political electioneering.

A study from 2004 found that half of CATA riders belong to a household with annual income below $20,000, compared to just 12% of nonriders.

Debt.org released a 2021 report that found that people earning $15,000 or less are far more likely to vote for Democrats. Democrats, it also said, are far more likely to support government assistance programs.

CATA serves Ingham County, which supported Joe Biden over Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential race by a margin of nearly 2-1. Voters in the city of Lansing supported Biden over Trump by more than a 3-to-1 margin.

“It is government-sponsored electioneering,” said Eric Doster, an election law expert and former general counsel to the Michigan GOP. “The clear effect of this service is provide Get Out The Vote activities for people who are inclined to voting yes on a bond proposal.”

CATA responded to an email and released a statement: "Providing free rides to the polls is a longstanding tradition at CATA and at many other public transit agencies across the country. Transportation should never be an obstacle to exercising one’s right to vote. We’re proud to provide a public service that helps citizens across the Greater Lansing region engage in our democracy, regardless of their partisan preferences."

According to a 2020 budget report, CATA collected $22.4 million from annual property tax levies. It's total revenue for the year was $50.4 million, of which $3.6 million came from fares. (In 2019 before the pandemic fares totaled $4.2 million.)

The Lansing School District debt proposal states the millage will impose a new tax of 0.58 mills on homeowners and other property owners, making taxpayers liable for $129.7 million in new debt over 25 years. The district claims that because some previous borrowing will be paid off this year, taxpayers will not see an increase in their property tax bills. (Taxpayers also will not see the tax cut they would otherwise receive if this new debt is not approved.) The added debt would represent the third new tax levy imposed by the district since 2016. The district will also receive $107.8 million in federal COVID-19 relief.