Michigan’s energy supply took a step toward reliability this week with the announcement that Palisades nuclear plant will resume operations. 

If and when Palisades gets back online, it will be the first nuclear plant in America to be taken offline and returned to active use. Right now, Palisades still appears on the “decommissioning” section of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission website. Its owner, Holtec International, is known for decommissioning retired nuclear plants.

What changed was the announcement of a $1.5 billion conditional loan from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office.

“Reopening Palisades is a great first step in expanding energy sources that Michigan residents can rely on at all times, not just when the sun shines and the wind blows,” said Jason Hayes, director of energy and environmental policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. “The loan from the federal government is an attempt to right a wrong that was caused by intrusive government policies. Energy sources should compete on a transparent and level playing field, free from government handouts and interference.”

Though the plant was taken offline in May 2022, it is licensed to operate through 2031, per the nuclear regulatory commission. The Biden administration says the plant will be upgraded to run through at least 2051, pending approval of the regulatory body.

Former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, now the U.S. Secretary of Energy, said in a statement that “nuclear power is our single largest source of carbon free electricity.”

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer noted that the plant will power roughly 800,000 homes. U.S. Census data indicate there is 4.6 million housing units in Michigan. Palisades alone will power 17% of the housing in Michigan.

A hearing of the Michigan Senate Appropriations Committee brought up again the question of whether Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s new education-focused department is constitution.

The Senate Appropriations Committee heard a presentation on March 6 by Emily Laidlaw, director of the Child Care Licensing Bureau within the new Michigan Department of Lifelong Education, Advancement, and Potential, or MiLEAP. Sen. Thomas A. Albert, R-Lowell, raised concerns over the constitutionality of the department.

“I have a question over the constitutionality of some of the recommendations made here today,” Albert said.

Albert quoted from Article 8, Section 3 of the Michigan Constitution, which says, the State Board of Education “shall serve as the general planning and coordinating body for all public education, including higher education, and shall advise the legislature as to the financial requirements in connection therewith.”

Albert then pointed to the Great Start Readiness Program, which is run by MiLEAP.

Michael Rice, superintendent of public instruction, was questioned about the new department, according to MIRS News. He did not agree with the decision to create it. But, he said, he would leave it up to the attorney general to decide the constitutional question. “It’s her decision.”

Rice asked Attorney General Dana Nessel to weigh in on the matter. Nessel said it would be premature for her to issue an official opinion.

“After the (governor’s executive order) becomes effective in December and MiLEAP begins to ‘implement its vision,” Nessel wrote, “there could be actions taken by MiLEAP that the Board (of Education) contends infringe on its constitutional authority. It is at that point, where a specific set of facts exists, that an opinion may be appropriate. Unless and until such a situation arises, however, issuing any type of opinion on potentially overlapping authority of the Board and MiLEAP is premature.”

Molly Macek, director of education policy at the Mackinac Center, thinks that MiLEAP’s plan to expand state spending on pre-K merits a constitutional review.

“As the ‘general planning and coordinating body for all public education, the State Board of Education should be involved in the Legislature’s financial decisions regarding public education programming,” Macek told CapCon. “MiLEAP is spending money on the expansion of pre-K; it would make sense for the state Board of Education to seek the attorney general’s opinion again on the constitutionality of this program.”

Editor’s note: Albert did not respond to a request for comment. After this story went live, a representative of Rice’s office reached out to CapCon, seeking a clarification of what the state superintendent said. We have updated the story to reflect his thoughts.