Most of the feedback given to the Grand Rapids climate action plan opposes it, according to public comment received through a records request.

The Wege Foundation pitched the plan for Michigan’s second-largest city, which houses about 200,000 people. More than half of public comments opposed one or more parts of the six-chapter plan.

Of the 42 public comments submitted to the city of Grand Rapids, 22 responses opposed parts of the draft plan while 18 supported it and two gave mixed feedback.

The plan spanned six chapters: Energy (more solar use), Healthy Homes (less electric use; income-based electric rates), Commercial buildings (less energy use), Transportation (more carpooling and cycling, denser developments), Natural Systems (more trees and rain gardens), and Food systems (more urban agriculture and composting, less food in trash). A majority of the feedback focused on commercial buildings.

The plan aims to reduce energy consumption by requiring building owners to report their energy use, creating building performance standards, and using tune-ups, audits, or retro-commissioning.

One respondent wrote: “It appears to be a feel-good, virtue-signaling, exercise undertaken by highly uninformed people without any appreciation for physics, economics, or common sense. That such a group has the chance of gaining effectively [sic] taxing authority through the City of Grand Rapids, en route to assessing fees to tax-paying, service-providing, business owners simply because we exist and house every business that makes the City of Grand Rapids function economically and socially is shocking.”

Other feedback welcomed the plan and said it didn’t go far enough.

“We are in a climate emergency and the department of sustainability are [sic] the City’s emergency response team,” the person wrote. “It’s time to be more aggressive and advocate for change like our life depends on it (because in this case, unfortunately, it does).”

The Wege Foundation has spent nearly $2 million over five years trying to get the city of Grand Rapids to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and encourage electrification, according to documents obtained through a record request.

The money partially funded the salaries of climate change workers and pilot projects. The funding paid the salary of a healthy and sustainable buildings policy specialist and the nonprofit Community Collaboration on Climate Change, among other things, according to 10 documents obtained through a records request.

The city of Grand Rapids will release a full draft of its climate action and adaptation plan in December. Enactment will depend on the decision of city commissioners.

The funding sought three outcomes. First, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from city operations by 85% by 2030 compared to 2008 and to achieve carbon neutrality by 2040.

The draft aims to achieve and maintain 100% renewable energy for 2025, 2030, and 2040 modeling.

Finally, the draft aims to transition the city vehicle fleet to a low or no-emission fleet.

The city of Grand Rapids has 798 vehicles and equipment, according to Steve Guitar, city of Grand Rapids media relations manager.

The Grand Rapids 2030 District is a program of the US Green Building Council of West Michigan launched in 2015 in partnership with the City of Grand Rapids funded by the Wege Foundation.

The GR2030 is one of three districts in Michigan, along with Ann Arbor and Detroit, and one of 22 across North America. The GR2030’s work decarbonizes buildings and transportation, as aligned with the goals of the Paris Climate Accord.

Taxpayers are on the hook for a new soccer stadium in Grand Rapids. Michigan and Kent County are contributing at least $252 million to the project.

The stadium will create more than 450 new jobs, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said in a news release.

In August, the Michigan Strategic Fund approved a $252 million Transformational Brownfield Plan to add housing, parking, an amphitheater, a riverwalk, an apartment building and a soccer stadium to the Grand Rapids riverfront.

The stadium development will include a 134,500-square-foot, 8,500-seat soccer stadium located west of downtown, hosting the only team in a major professional sports league in Grand Rapids. It will include a full-size soccer pitch to support national and international matches.

Kent County already had a 5% excise tax on its lodging industry. Voters narrowly approved an increase to 8%, which will bring in another $8 million.

County commissioners approved an amendment in August to add aquariums and sports complexes to an ordinance that specifies how money from the excise tax can be spent.

A convention and arena authority governed by a seven-member board administers DeVos Place, DeVos Performance Hall and Van Andel Arena. It will also own and operate the soccer stadium.

Ivan Diaz, a Kent County commissioner, voted against a local tax increase that will help fund the stadium.

“I voted no on raising the tax because in my view, the parameters for how the revenue from the tax would be used was not and is not in the public interest,” stated Diaz in an email to CapCon.

“The fact is that these projects are being pushed by the DeVos and VanAndel families, who will likely own the soccer team and the vendors at the facility,” Diaz added.

A recent study by James Hohman, fiscal policy director at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, concluded that taxpayer subsidies offered in the name of job creation almost always fail to deliver.

The state has spent $22.7 billion in business subsidies since 2000. Most of the money funded the auto industry, according to Hohman. Despite that, Michigan has lost 145,600 of the 315,000 auto industry jobs it had in 2000.

Former Gov. Jennifer Granholm experienced similar results after she spent millions of taxpayer dollars on green energy businesses. She touted massive job creation and said Michigan would be the green energy hub of the world. Her green energy revolution fizzled out.

Projects such as soccer stadiums don’t happen on their own, Kara Wood, executive director of Grand Action 2.0, said during a Nov. 7 Kent County Commission meeting.

“It’s through these intentional public private partnerships that make these transformational projects happen in our community,” she told meeting participants.

A sports venue is a questionable use of taxpayer funds, said Rep. Ann Bollin, R-Brighton Township, a member of the House Appropriations Committee. She told Michigan Capitol Confidential in an email she does not support the subsidy.

The history of Pontiac Silverdome provides a glimpse of what can happen when governments subsidize stadium construction and operations.

In 1975, the city of Pontiac paid $55.7 million to build the Silverdome. The Detroit Lions then played there until they relocated back to Detroit in 2002.

In 2009, a company bought the Silverdome for $583,000, according to Crain’s Detroit Business. This means the city sold the stadium for 1.05% of the original construction costs.