Commentary

Michigan Road Funding at Record Levels Without Proposed Tax Hike

Lawmakers should be aware of the amount currently being spent on roads

State taxpayers are putting more money into the roads than ever before. In inflation-adjusted terms, the $3.6 billion being spent this year is the most in history, or at least since 1940 — as far back as state records allow for making comparisons.

In conducting this research, we wanted to look at just the resources that the state government uses for the roads. So we excluded money from federal, local and private funds, where possible. The state transfers some of its funds to local governments to spend on local roads, and those figures are counted here. But the resources that local governments generate to spend on their own roads from property tax millages are not included.

Finding the historical records on state spending and comparing them with recent data was harder than it may seem. Things in Michigan have changed over time. The Department of State Highways became the Michigan Department of Transportation. Fiscal years ending in June became fiscal years ending in September. Accounting standards changed. Annual reports included different information from year to year.

Because of all these moving parts, we wanted to make sure to cover all the bases. So, we tracked state funding of roads since 1940 with three related, but different measures: annual appropriations passed by the Legislature, year-end state financial reports and state transportation department spending records.

Annual appropriations come in the form of laws passed by the Legislature that give the transportation department the authority to spend money and to transfer money to local governments for transportation purposes. We were able to find these appropriations going back to 1951. We excluded federal or local revenue, where applicable, but the earliest of these documents did not say where the money came from. This omission would overstate the amount of state money spent on the roads in earlier years.

The state issues reports on its annual finances after its fiscal year concludes. Here you can find revenues for the Michigan Transportation Fund, which receives money from the state’s fuel and vehicle registration taxes as well as other state sources. We were able to get MTF revenues going back to 1940.

The Michigan Department of Transportation — formerly the Department of State Highways — publicizes its revenue in annual reports. These reports go back to 1974, and the document for that year also contains a chart showing revenue levels going back to 1952.

We adjusted all three measures to the Consumer Price Index, doing so in a way that took into account the state moving the start of its fiscal year from July 1 to Oct 1. as of 1976.

None of these measures, by themselves, provide perfectly consistent data on state road funding. For instance, the MDOT reports were not in the state library for 1977 or 1979 and were not produced after 1998. As a result, we interpolated these data when needed and projected them into the current fiscal year based on the proportional increase reported by budget authorizations. State budget laws grant authority to spend money, but the state doesn’t always spend the full amount legislators grant it. And the state could spend money on the roads without accounting for it as revenue from the MTF.

Despite these shortcomings, the picture provided by each of these three measures tells a similar story: State road funding is at record levels.

All three measures show steady road funding growth starting in the early ‘50s and lasting to the late ‘70s. Stagflation took its toll after that, and real revenue for roads declined until incremental increases appeared in the second half of the ‘80s and through the ‘90s. Inflation ate into road funding again in the early 2000s, and revenue levels declined during Michigan’s decade-long, one-state recession. But road funding has been on an upsurge since 2012 and now stands at slightly above record levels.

These figures do not include all of the new revenue that might be committed as a result of the 2015 road funding plan. The plan, if implemented in full, would deliver another $336 million for the roads, pushing total state revenue spent on them across the $4 billion line. As lawmakers discuss the governor’s plan to raise taxes by $2.5 billion in order to spend an additional $1.9 billion on the roads, they should be aware that we’re already at record levels of road funding.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

News Story

Detroit Schools The Nation’s Worst, Super Want Its Teacher Pay The Nation’s Best

Worst urban district for 10 years per Nation’s Report Card, but Detroit gives its own teacher high marks

Detroit Public Schools Community District Superintendent Nikolai Vitti has called for his district’s teachers to become the highest paid in the nation.

Vitti said in an op-ed published in the Detroit Free Press that his legacy and that of the school board “will rest on making Detroit teachers the highest paid in the state and country. Detroit teachers deserve to be the highest paid because our children deserve the best teachers in each of the classrooms they enter and leave every day.”

Vitti’s essay deserves some scrutiny, however.

Should a school district with an academic track record as poor as Detroit’s — one that reaches back for at least 10 years — be rewarded with the additional tax dollars required to make its staff the nation’s highest paid?

Every two years, the National Assessment of Educational Progress evaluates the academic progress of students in America’s largest cities and publishes its findings under the banner of “The Nation’s Report Card.” The ratings are based on fourth- and eighth-grade student test results on math, reading, science and writing.

In 2009, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2017, the Detroit public school district finished last in every one of those categories.

Another school quality indicator, created by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, incorporates students’ socioeconomic background into its analysis. Schools with a higher proportion of students from low-income households are compared against schools serving similar populations. This provides an apples-to-apples indication of how those schools are doing. (Schools with a more affluent population tend to do better on standardized tests.)

Based on the adjusted results, the Mackinac Center report card gives each school a letter grade. Of the Detroit district’s 22 high schools, 18 received an F; 55 of its 69 elementary and middle schools also earned an F grade in the most recent report.

In his op-ed, Vitti said Detroit teachers should be the highest paid because Detroit’s children deserve the best teachers.

If the district’s evaluations of its own teachers are taken at face value, its academic problems lie not with the faculty of these failing schools. Detroit has given remarkably good ratings to its teachers, considering how poorly the district’s students have fared academically.

In the district’s most recent evaluations, 95% of the 2,856 teachers evaluated were rated either “highly-effective” (37%) or “effective” (58%) in 2017-18. Just 4% were rated minimally effective and only 1% were rated ineffective. That’s in line with the state average, where 40% of teachers were rated by their own district’s administrators as “highly effective” and another 58% as “effective.”

“According to the district, 95% of current teachers are effective, yet the average student test scores are abysmal,” said Michael Van Beek, director of research for the Mackinac Center. “It’s not clear at all how giving these same teachers large salary increases will improve the overall academic performance of the district. Detroit teachers may very well be deserving of a pay bump, but it sure doesn’t show up in the student achievement results.”

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.