Commentary

How to Solve Government Employee Retiree Health Insurance Costs

Freeze salary schedules until health insurance is fully funded

Some local government officials have gotten their governments into a mess and cannot get out without help. They’ve promised retiree medical insurance to unionized employees and did not set aside money to pay for it. This pushed the costs of yesterday to today, stretching finances thin. The state government can help deal with this fiscal issue.

Retiree medical insurance tends to be something less than a promise: Employees have no legal right to it and government officials can rescind benefits at their discretion. But when these benefits are etched out in collective bargaining agreements, they may become contractual rights.

Government managers can use these benefits to get services now but defer the costs to future taxpayers. To combat this, governments could set aside money today to pay for the benefits promised tomorrow. This ensures that promises are paid when services are delivered. It prevents the benefits from becoming debts of future taxpayers.

Few governments have done so. Indeed, prefunding retiree medical insurance benefits at local governments across the state would cost at least $9 billion. Only a portion of this is contractually mandated, but that is determined on a government-by-government basis.

Many of the state’s governments no longer offer these benefits to new employees. That is a good thing and will prevent this situation from spiraling further out of control, but does not deal with their current costs.

The state can help manage the remaining legacy costs by making them a priority.

Where employees have contractual rights to retiree medical insurance benefits, the state can establish that any additional revenue being spent on unionized workers goes to paying down retiree insurance costs. To do this, the Legislature can mandate that unionized salary schedules remain frozen until retiree insurance is fully funded.

This is fair. Taxpayers would be handing out the same levels of compensation for services, just divvied up differently among benefits. It would be up to the unions to decide which areas of compensation provide the best return to their members.

And so far, retiree medical insurance has been a low priority. If employees themselves cared about the benefits, they would have insisted that it be funded.

There are some examples of governments in Michigan that have set aside enough to pay for these benefits, but more often than not they have been deferred to future taxpayers.

Government managers and unions got themselves into this mess and taxpayers are now having to pay for it. Putting retiree health insurance savings before wage hikes means that managers and unions would have to work on this problem together without harming the public.

Local officials may not have paid enough attention to this problem in the past. These fiscal problems are self-inflicted. There is no state mandate to offer these benefits, nor to kick their costs to future taxpayers. Nor did local officials have to agree with unions to provide them. Such benefits are rare in the private sector. One way to get both local government managers and their union counterparts to take the costs seriously is to mandate that underfunded medical benefits get first priority for additional funds.

This may cause union officials to come back to the negotiating table. Salary and benefits are both forms of compensation and this may force unions to prioritize. If an extra dollar is more valuable in the form of wage increases, then they can negotiate down their retiree medical insurance benefits. Or they can help local governments find ways to get up to full funding so that their wages may increase again.

Both would be wins for taxpayers that should never have been losers. And lawmakers should side with them in this debate and pass a law mandating first priority be given to funding retiree medical insurance for unionized local government employees.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

News Story

Fraser Public Schools Explains Its Role In A Union Pension Spiking Scheme

Superintendent says the law allows it and legislators had the chance to end it but didn't

Fraser Public Schools Superintendent David Richards

During the 2017-2018 school fiscal year, teacher Paula Herbart has requested, and has been granted, a professional services leave of absence, for the purpose of serving as the President of the Michigan Education Association.

Pursuant to Article VI I of the currently effective collective bargaining agreement between the Fraser School District and MEA/NEA Local 1, Ms. Herbart’s collective bargaining representative, the granting of such a professional services leave of absence, “Officer’s Leave of Absence”, is mandatory.

The Fraser School District is required to grant any such leave of absence requests, be that of Ms. Herbart, or of any other Fraser Public Schools teacher seeking to serve as President, MEA/NEA Local 1, NEA or MEA officer (the MEA/NEA president, vice-president, secretary-treasurer). This provision has existed within the MEA/NEA Local 1 contract with the Fraser School District for many years.

Furthermore, the Michigan Legislature, not the Fraser School District, has expressly provided for the accrual of years of service within the Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System, “MPSERS”, for the time a public school employee is on a professional services leave of absence, Section 71 of the Public School Employees Retirement Act of 1979, MCL 38.1371.

In this regard the legislature has chosen to allow service credit accrual, so long as the compensation reported by a school district to the Office of Retirement Services (“ORS”) does not exceed that amount that the employee would have received if still actively employed by the school district, and the employee or his/her union fully reimburses the school district, on a current basis, for all sums paid to the ORS.

The ORS has determined that these sums must include both the employer and the employee retirement contributions and must be in cash.

In 2015 Senate Bill 279 was introduced and, if passed, would have prohibited MPSERS service credit accrual while a public school employee was on a professional services leave of absence. However, Senate Bill 279 was never reported out of committee and died at the end of the legislative session. Accordingly, Michigan law continues to authorize and facilitate service credit accrual.

The only accommodation that the Fraser School District has afforded to Ms. Herbart is the agreement to process her through its official payroll. This accommodation is at absolutely no cost to the Fraser School District for the reason that MEA-NEA Local 1 has assumed the obligation to reimburse the Fraser School District for all such salary, payroll taxes, charges, and MPSERS contributions.

Therefore, Ms. Herbart’s current leave status and her continued participation within the MPSERS is entirely consistent with the governing collective bargaining agreement and existing law as enabled by the Michigan legislature.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.