Giving A Friend A Manicure Or Haircut Is Illegal in Michigan
And getting the license takes more training than homebuilders or EMTs
You’re breaking the law if you cut the hair of another person in Michigan without the government’s permission, even if it’s for a friend or family member, and even if there’s no charge. An aunt cutting her nephew’s hair? Illegal. A girlfriend giving her boyfriend a trim? Not allowed. And teenage girls giving each other manicures? They’re all committing misdemeanor crimes under Michigan law.
That’s according to the state statutes imposing licensure requirements on barbers and cosmetologists. The law states, “An individual shall not perform any form of cosmetology services, with or without compensation, on any individual other than a member of his or her immediate family without a license under this article.”
Barbers were one of the first professions on which the state of Michigan imposed licensing restrictions. The requirements are stringent: Getting a barber’s license here requires an individual to take 1,800 hours of classroom and practical training – and that’s down from the 2,000 hours required a few years ago. These are among the nation’s most restrictive occupational licensure mandates in terms of the number of training hours required. It is nearly eight times the number required to get a New York license, to cite one example.
And that’s after the would-be practitioner has paid in the neighborhood of $12,000 to $20,000 in tuition to a barber school, according to Damon Dorsey, president of the American Barber Association.
Dorsey told Michigan Capitol Confidential the amount of time and debt associated with becoming a licensed barber has led to more unlicensed people providing the service illegally in their homes. The facts back this up. In 2018, there were 83 complaints filed with the state against barbers, and most of them were complaints about someone operating without a license.
“The ABA has gotten countless complaints from students on the cost of barbering school and time it takes to get a barber’s license,” Dorsey said. “As it is, many people forgo getting a barber’s license and just cut hair in their kitchen and basement, as they refuse to be strapped down by debt and spend two years of their lives qualifying for a barber’s license.”
Dorsey said that it takes the average person one-and-a-half to three years to become a barber; and he called the classroom requirements out-of-date.
“Most barbers will agree that it should not take [1,800] hours of practice to become a barber,” he said. “Forty to 80 hours should be sufficient, especially if continuing education is available. Also, technology makes it possible for students to take classes online, which should make it much easier to speed up the process.”
To put those numbers in context, the training hours to be a barber are several times more than the number required to become a licensed homebuilder, auto mechanic or emergency medical technician.
In 2013, Alabama became the last state to require a license for barbers. A 2018 study by Edward Timmons found that this increased profits for licensees, caused fewer shops to open and drove prices higher for consumers. “This comparison produces evidence consistent with the economic theory that occupational licensing restricts competition and harms consumers by limiting choice and increasing prices,” said the report.
Several bills have been recently introduced to cut back on the barbering mandates. Senate Bill 691, introduced by Sen. Wayne Schmidt, R-Traverse City, and Sen. Ken Horn, R-Frankenmuth, would allow apprenticeship hours to cover the training requirements. State Rep. Steven Johnson, R-Wayland, introduced House Bill 5438, which would eliminate the state requirement that individuals get a license before being able to become a barber.
“Quite simply, state government has a thousand better things to do than tell barbers how to cut hair,” Johnson said in a press release. “This license is an unnecessary regulation and does nothing to protect public safety.”
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Higher Education Subsidies Do Not Produce Better Educational or Economic Results
Nevertheless, some lawmakers are pushing for more
The lowest funded of Michigan’s 15 public universities, Oakland University, is pushing a “Strive for 45” goal this year. The aim is for all universities to receive a minimum of $4,500 per student from taxpayers.
Michigan’s system of university appropriations is arbitrary and skewed where different schools get different levels of state support for no clear reason. There’s no formula to ensure that all public entities are treated equally, like there is for funding K-12 schools. It’s just the way things have always been done around here.
Establishing a fair funding formula for public universities would be an improvement, but there’s actually little reason to believe that this state spending produces much widespread good. Sure, it may help limit how much schools increase their tuition in the short-term, but even the data used by advocates for spending more on higher education suggests there are better uses of these taxpayer funds.
My analysis of Michigan’s data of state funding, tuition and fees and graduation rates does not show that colleges receiving more state appropriations do a better job. Three of the four universities getting the least in state funding — GVSU, UM-Flint and SVSU — charge among the lowest tuition and fees. Wayne State, which gets the second-most in state funding, has the worst graduation rate – which isn’t great even after adjusting for the fact that WSU serves more low-income students than other schools.
Still, advocates claim more money will improve outcomes of public universities.
Gongwer News reports that “Michigan lags its neighbors in the Midwest and the nation on per-resident support for higher education according to data compiled by Illinois State University and the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association.” This was presented at a recent hearing where lawmakers are considering more spending, noting that Michigan is 44 out of 50 for university spending.
"We know from federal employment data that in states with a higher proportion of college graduates, even workers without a degree also tend to earn more," Michigan Association of State Universities CEO Daniel Hurley said. "That's because college graduates are better able to pay skilled trades workers for home and vehicle work, service economy workers, health care workers and others, providing a rising income tide that lifts all workers in a state."
Even accepting all those facts, this report doesn’t show what advocates seem to think it does. What’s assumed between the lines is that transferring more money from taxpayers to state universities automatically produces more college graduates working in Michigan and better economic outcomes for all. But the reality is that there’s not even a discernible connection in the data between how much a state subsidizes universities and how many college graduates live in the state.
Here’s the chart of how much each state spends per-resident on its public universities. Here are the top spending states as well as their national rank for the percentage of college graduates in their state: Wyoming (42), North Dakota (31), Nebraska (19), Alaska (28) and New Mexico (39). The lowest spending states with their ranks are New Hampshire (9), Pennsylvania (21), Vermont (7), Colorado (2) and Rhode Island (14). Most of the 10 states with the highest percentage of college graduates spend less than the national average on their universities.
A look at the evidence doesn’t show more taxpayer support leads to better educational outcomes whether comparing schools here in Michigan or states across the nation. Lawmakers should spend taxpayer dollars elsewhere.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Enjoying CapCon?
Make sure you aren’t missing anything! Sign up for our daily or weekly emails and get the quarterly print edition mailed to your home. All free!
Get CapCon emails! Get CapCon print!
No thanks, I prefer to visit the CapCon website!
More From CapCon