Commentary

‘Too good to be true’ New York $1B solar boondoggle a warning for Michigan

Promised a manufacturing hub, Buffalo got a Tim Horton’s coffee shop

New York state has plunked down more than $1 billion since 2015 on a Tesla factory that makes solar panels. Building and supplying the plant “was a bad deal,” The Wall Street Journal reports.

The Journal this week ran a story on the Buffalo-area project, which “was supposed to be the largest solar-panel factory in the Western Hemisphere,” according to the Journal.

The debacle in the Empire State comes as Michigan lawmakers commit large sums of taxpayer money to electric vehicle sites in the Big Rapids and Marshall areas.

James Hohman, the Mackinac Center’s director of fiscal policy, has warned that job announcements are not jobs. Politicians use corporate welfare to facilitate job announcements, as New York politicians did with the Tesla solar factory.

If — and often, when — the jobs numbers don’t deliver, the politicians have either moved on to new posts or other projects (or in the case of former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, to retirement against his will).

Media outlets that wrote approvingly of the project, based on nothing but watercolor renderings and spin, are ill-inclined to call a foul on themselves. They move on, too. With nobody seeking accountability, there is none.

Government and supportive media have a conflict of interest when it comes to the truth. It took The Wall Street Journal to expose the broken promise in Buffalo. It took HBO’s Real Sports to expose the broken promise of The District Detroit. The journalists closest to the situation were too busy waving pompoms. They were supporters, not reporters.

The people of Buffalo were promised a “manufacturing hub.” They got a Tim Horton’s. As The Journal reports:

The suppliers that Cuomo predicted would flock to a modern manufacturing hub never showed up. The only new nearby business is a Tim Horton’s coffee shop. Most of the solar-panel manufacturing equipment bought by the state has been sold at a discount or scrapped.

A state comptroller’s audit found just 54 cents of economic benefit for every subsidy dollar spent on the factory, which rose on the site of an old steel mill. External auditors have written down nearly all of New York’s investment.

“It was a bad deal,” the Journal quotes New York state Sen. Sean Ryan, D-Buffalo. “A cautionary tale is you can’t give governors too much power to get on the phone with egotistical billionaires.”

The Mackinac Center maintains statistics on job creation at subsidized projects in Michigan. The promises of corporate welfare are rarely met. The New York factory created just enough jobs to avoid a penalty.

The promises were bellowed. The results were whispered.

What have we learned?

Next week, there will be another press conference. Another announcement. More renderings. Big numbers thrown about. Breathless headlines published.

And no follow-through from the usual suspects.

James David Dickson is managing editor of Michigan Capitol Confidential. Email him at dickson@mackinac.org.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

Washington Watch

Walberg bill would roll back anti-gas engine regulations

Proposed regulations would ‘hand the keys of America’s auto industry to China,’ Michigan congressman says

U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Tipton, introduced a bill Thursday to protect the gas engine from federal regulators.

Walberg and his co-sponsors call House Resolution 4468 the CARS Act, meaning “Choice in Automobile Retail Sales.” Its official title — “To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing a proposed rule with respect to emissions from vehicles, and for other purposes” — shows the real game. The CARS Act is about regulatory rollback. Existing regulations favor the electric vehicle and target the gas engine, critics say.

Read it for yourself: The CARS Act of 2023

In April, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued a proposed rule “with the intent of advancing the deployment of electric vehicles,” as Walberg describes it.

“This rule would require over two-thirds of all new vehicles to be electric by 2032,” the Walberg statement continues.

Walberg’s bill would stop the EPA from finalizing or enforcing the proposed rule, known as “Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Year 2027 and Later Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles.”

Walberg sees in the proposed regulation a system that favors the electric vehicle and punishes the gas engine, forcing Americans into vehicles they cannot afford. He describes the proposed regulation as “driving up costs for people and handing the keys of America’s auto industry to China.”

Related reading: Biden wants to juice EV demand by killing the gas engine

“This proposal has raised serious concerns regarding the accessibility of affordable vehicles for the average American consumer,” reads the Walberg statement. “According to data from Kelley Blue Book, the average price of an electric vehicle was over $17,000 more than the average price of a gas-powered vehicle. This expense would come in addition to the extra $10,000 families nationwide have spent over the last two years due to the economic crisis fueled by inflation.”

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.