Charter Schools ‘Unregulated?’ Only If You Ignore All Those Rules
New York nonprofit gets the anti-charter buzzwords right, misses the real story
A New York-based nonprofit that reports on education joined a growing number of anti-charter school voices when it stated that public school academies in Michigan are not regulated. The group’s publication, called The 74, recently published a nearly 2,500-word article that included unsubstantiated and unattributed claims about the alleged absence of regulation.
For example, The 74 wrote, “Within Michigan, and particularly Detroit, charter operators exist in the absence of regulations that are common elsewhere.”
The Michigan Association of Public School Academies says that claim is inaccurate.
Alicia Urbain, MAPSA’s vice president of government and legal affairs, recently wrote a blog post listing many of the regulations to which Michigan charters are subject:
- Charter schools are closed if their academic performance places them among the bottom 5 percent of public schools for three years in a row as tracked by the state. No such consequence applies to failing conventional public schools in Michigan, and the state is unable to name a convention public school that has been closed for academic reasons.
- Charter schools are subject to the same legal requirement as other public schools to serve special education children.
- Michigan charter schools must participate in standardized state testing.
- Michigan charter schools must hire state-certified teachers and administrators.
- Michigan charter schools must evaluate their teachers and administrators each year.
- Michigan charter schools must comply with the Open Meetings Act and the Freedom of Information Act. Charter schools also have to provide the salaries of all of its teachers and administrators in a FOIA request.
- Charter schools must post extensive financial information online.
“Charter schools in Michigan have to follow every law and regulation that applies to any other traditional public school with the exception of a few,” Urbain wrote in her post.
She indicated that those few exceptions include:
- Charter schools have tougher conflict of interest laws than conventional schools. At a conventional school, school board members must recuse themselves from a vote on a contract in which they have a conflict of interest. Charter school board members are prohibited from being on a board that would have such a conflict.
- Charter teachers are not subject to a teacher tenure system.
- Charters must accept any student who wants to attend, limited only by building occupancy limits and enrollment caps in their charter agreement. If more students want to attend than a school can serve, it must hold an enrollment lottery.
- Charters can’t levy property tax millages, including ones to pay for land and buildings or special education services. They cannot have a "sinking fund" levy to augment state aid.
- Michigan’s charters can contract out for all services. Conventional Michigan schools contract out for many services, but not for instructional services.
That last item allows Michigan charter schools to be organized in a way that makes them not subject to mandatory unionization.
“It’s flat-out wrong to claim that charter schools are unregulated,” said Buddy Moorehouse, spokesman for the Michigan Association of Public School Academies. “The fact is, charter schools are the most heavily regulated of all public schools in Michigan. In addition to having to follow all the same regulations that traditional public schools have to follow, charters have an additional set of regulations they have to operate under.”
This refers to the detailed contracts, or charters, between public school academies and the institutions that “charter” them, which in Michigan, are mostly state universities. Among many other items, a charter prescribes academic and other performance benchmarks a school must meet to retain its charter.
The 74 responded to an email sent by Michigan Capitol Confidential asking about many of the issues with its story, but the response did not address the article’s claim about an alleged lack of charter school regulation in Michigan.
In a third installment of this analysis, Michigan Capitol Confidential will address the claim made in The 74’s 2,500 word article about Michigan’s system of public school funding.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Accessing Better Detroit Schools Out of Reach for Some
Transportation scholarships could help level playing field
Students struggling to escape an ineffective education often lack a couple of key tools: credible, useful information and safe, reliable transportation. The new Detroit Schools Guide is helping parents learn about what different schools offer, but large-scale solutions to overcome the other barrier have been hard to come by. A little-discussed state proposal to offer transportation scholarships to low-income families could help tackle the other challenge.
Detroit continues to rank as the lowest performing urban school district on national achievement tests. More than half of the city's 100,000-plus school-aged children have left Detroit Public Schools Community District for a public charter school or a suburban district. Most of these parents are satisfied with their children's new learning environments. But better schooling options remain out of reach for some.
Finding safe, reliable transportation to and from school remains a hindrance for some who want a better option than what's nearest to where they live. Backed by Mayor Mike Duggan and some key education leaders, a new bus loop serving 10 schools in northwest Detroit has gotten rolling this fall. But it covers less than 10 percent of city schools, and it's too soon to know how well it is working.
One thing we do know is that families with the resources to travel to better schools are more than willing to make the trip. A new Urban Institute analysis of Detroit students' travel times confirms the finding: "On average, students are actually attending a school of slightly higher quality than their nearest available alternative." In some neighborhoods, where there is a dearth of good options, finding a safer school with a little bit better academic record can make a crucial difference. And multiple metrics have shown public charter schools in the Motor City outperforming district-run schools. Families are generally attracted to better results.
Yet the likelihood of attending a better school depends on characteristics that shouldn't matter. The Urban Institute report finds black, Hispanic, disabled and low-income students are even less likely to attend Detroit's few high-quality schools than their more well-off counterparts. One way to explain the disparity is this: While families are willing to travel to get better results, and high-quality charter schools are proven to deliver those results, too many students are simply unable to manage the logistics of getting to them every day.
Better high schools particularly, many clustered near the downtown area, are often too far away. Bus service is available to some charter schools and for choice students to attend some districts beyond their home boundaries. Fewer than half of the 100-plus charter school parents from Detroit who responded to a recent Mackinac Center survey said their child takes the bus to school. A small number indicated they drive their kids from 20 up to 50 minutes away, but that isn't realistic for most.
Some parents may need more assistance to pay for their child to attend a quality school in a different part of Detroit, or outside the city. As part of his education agenda, gubernatorial candidate Bill Schuette has proposed a system of transportation scholarships for low-income families to access a variety of learning opportunities. Such scholarships could help more families find the learning environment that works best for them. They also could serve as a stopgap until lawmakers fix no-fault auto insurance and make vehicle ownership less expensive, especially in Detroit.
While Lansing lawmakers scuttled a transportation scholarship proposal last year, the idea is still ripe for another try. Whether such a program would lead to more schools operating yellow buses, greater access to ridesharing services or some other means of expanding a family's access to needed educational options, critical details would need to be resolved.
But putting more power in the hands of families, not only to choose a school but also to be able to make the daily trip, should help make school systems more responsive to what students need.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Follow us on social media!
Push back on big government “solutions” by becominga fan of us on Facebook and X. Plus you can share free-market news to your network!
Facebook
I already follow CapCon!
More From CapCon