Michigan’s Largest Teachers Union Funds Leftist Activist Group
Michigan Education Association gave Progress Michigan $71,000 this year
Progress Michigan bills itself as “a communications team and media hub for the entire progressive community.” But the composition of the group’s board and identity of some of its major contributors suggest that the liberal nonprofit is more of a communications team for government employee unions.
Required informational filings released by the Michigan Education Association this week show the teachers union gave Progress Michigan $71,000 in 2016-17. In 2014, Progress Michigan took $67,000 from the National Education Association, the MEA’s national union home.
Three of the six members of Progress Michigan’s board are officials in government employee unions. They include Doug Pratt, the MEA’s public affairs director, Bob Allison, executive director of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Michigan State Council, and Georgi-Ann Bargamian, a regional director of the United Auto Workers. The UAW represents thousands of Michigan state government employees.
Progress Michigan has posted articles critical of school choice, which is a major issue with the MEA.
"We're proud to have the support of teachers who are working every day to provide a quality education for every Michigan student as opposed to the Mackinac Center and this publication which simply does the bidding of anti-education zealots, the DeVos family,” said Progress Michigan’s Executive Director Lonnie Scott in an email.
Scott also focuses a good deal of the organization’s efforts on criticizing “wealthy GOP donors” in the media and other outlets. The organization’s slogan used to be, “No corporate money. Uncompromised progressive politics for Michigan.”
Interestingly, the “No corporate money” part has disappeared from Progress Michigan’s current branding.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Assessing Michigan’s Alleged Teacher Shortage
Over 100,000 qualified teachers are not employed by a public school
It’s a common refrain recently that Michigan is facing a teacher shortage. But is that really true?
Those who say it is typically point to two facts. First, the number of teaching certificates given out annually has fallen by nearly two-thirds in recent years, from 9,665 in 2004 to 3,696 in 2016. On a related note, the number of students enrolled in teacher preparation programs at Michigan colleges has fallen by about 40 percent.
Those numbers aren’t in dispute, but there’s more to the story.
The number of people going to college to obtain a teaching certificate increased significantly before the recent drop-off. So the decline in teacher prep programs may be nothing more than what scholars call a regression to the mean, or a return to a long-term pattern.
The evidence suggests this is the case: The state reports that there are 104,667 people who have an active teaching certificate but are not employed by a public school. That’s a pool of potential teachers that exceeds the number of teachers currently teaching in Michigan’s school districts. So perhaps the decline in certificates is simply the result of people responding to how many educators are already out in the market competing for jobs.
This large pool of potential teachers helps explain why, despite fewer people getting certificates in recent years, districts don’t appear to have many problems filling teacher vacancies.
Michigan Capitol Confidential submitted open records requests to dozens of school districts to see how many applicants they received for their open teaching positions. Nearly every school got dozens — and in some cases, hundreds — of applicants for every vacancy. Portage averaged 41 applicants per position, Novi got 123 per job, Dearborn, 38, and Grand Rapids received 72 applications for each open position, just to name a few examples.
It is true that some positions are harder to fill than others, such as special education, some foreign languages and math. But the way to deal with this challenge is by paying higher salaries for those positions. Districts generally refuse to do this, however, and instead pay all teachers, no matter what they teach or how hard they are to find, according to the same logic. Only logging more years on the payroll or obtaining extra college credits earns a teacher higher pay under nearly all district pay scales.
Since only a few school districts are willing to pay hard-to-find teachers more, this raises the question of whether they are really experiencing a genuine problem with finding new teachers.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Love CapCon?
The best way you can help support our work is to become a donor. Give monthly or one-time. What do you say — buy our reporters a cup of coffee?
Have a coffee on me! Already a supporter