A Cautionary Tale About Job Promises And Corporate Subsidies
GM’s promised 6,000 Poletown jobs never appeared; Ford announces 3,000
General Motors and Ford Motor Co. are in the news for reasons that have little in common but serve as a cautionary tale about using job projections from corporate and government economic development agencies to guide policy.
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer announced this week that in return for as much as $35 million in state subsidies, Ford promises to add 3,000 well-paying jobs at its Michigan Assembly Plant in the city of Wayne.
GM, for its part, is in the news for reports that it will lay off as many as 814 workers at its Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly plant, otherwise known as the Poletown plant.
The link between these two events is that in both cases, speculative job promises were the centerpiece of efforts to obtain large taxpayer-funded subsidies from state officials. In the more recent example, the governor’s press release use the word “job” or “jobs” 17 times.
The GM Detroit-Hamtramck assembly plant opened in 1985, with projections it would save as many as 6,100 jobs in Michigan. In June 1980, GM announced it was closing two older plants that had a combined 6,000 workers.
A new plant would be built in Detroit-Hamtramck that would save those jobs.
Except, that plant never came close to employing 6,000 people.
Taxpayers paid $200 million to assemble and clear the site, which was sold to GM for $8 million in the early 1980s. The automaker was also granted 12 years of property tax exemptions on the site, according to a Dec. 5, 1993, Detroit Free Press story.
In return for the subsidies and tax breaks, GM was to provide those 6,000-plus jobs.
Reports from media outlets and GM show that the company came the closest to meeting that number when the plant first opened. A May 31, 1989, Detroit Free Press story reported that in fall 1985, the plant was running two shifts that employed 5,300 to 5,400 workers.
Within four years, the number of hourly workers had dropped to 3,000, according to a May 31, 1989, Detroit Free Press story.
According to Knight-Ridder Tribune News Wires and the Los Angeles Times, employment at the Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly Plant ranged from 4,100 to 4,200 in 1993 and 1994.
By 1996, the newspaper reported that there were 3,200 hourly workers.
Then GM reported it had 1,619 employees at the plant in 2013.
When state agencies award subsidies, their announcements are usually accompanied by press releases filled with exciting job projections. The media rarely follow up on the projections reported in early stories about the awards.
But reviews by the Michigan Auditor General of the state’s corporate subsidy programs have found they generate far fewer jobs than promised.
As reported in October by Michigan Capitol Confidential: “A 2013 analysis by the state’s Auditor General found that just 19% of the jobs projected by the MEDC’s 21st Century Jobs Trust Fund came to fruition.”
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Michigan Bureaucrats Want to Force Unions on Pot Businesses
Labor interests want to use state regulations to grow union revenue
Michigan voters legalized recreational marijuana through a ballot proposal last year, and labor unions are seeing green. Big Labor and its allies are trying to use state regulations to grow union revenue.
After Michigan became a right-to-work state in 2013, most its largest unions have seen big declines in membership and revenue. State law and U.S. Supreme Court decisions have rendered it illegal for unions to force workers to pay them money in order to hold a job. This has freed hundreds of thousands of teachers, auto workers, day care employees, state workers, home caregivers and more.
But unions are not taking this laying down. Organized labor has made a move, using government regulators, to force legal marijuana businesses to make a “labor peace agreement with a union" before they can be licensed to operate. This will force these businesses to accept unionization efforts without resistance.
The state’s argument is that the marijuana market is so vitally important to the state that an agreement is necessary so workers do not disrupt the growing and selling of marijuana. In response to legislative questioning, Marijuana Regulatory Agency Executive Director Andrew Brisbo explained, according to MIRS News, that the rule was vital because “any sort of labor stoppage could disrupt the industry and send customers back to the black market.”
If this were a real threat, there would be similar requirements for all kinds of different industries. For example, any labor stoppage from doctors and nurses could force people to resort to unlicensed medical practitioners. Should hospitals be required to have such labor peace agreements? Pharmacists give out important drugs and a stoppage from them might encourage consumers to buy illegal drugs. What if entire grocery store chains were closed because of worker strikes?
It’s hard to fathom why marijuana businesses should be considered especially important to the state, considering how this market did not exist until just now. What prevents work stoppages from damaging an industry is competition; firms whose workers go on strike risk losing market share, so they have a keen incentive to prevent such stoppages. There’s no good reason to believe that the marijuana market can’t be just as dynamic and competitive as other markets, which makes this proposed rule unnecessary.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Follow us on social media!
Push back on big government “solutions” by becominga fan of us on Facebook and X. Plus you can share free-market news to your network!
Facebook
I already follow CapCon!
More From CapCon