Editorial

Pension Debt ‘Like a Mortgage?’ Yeah – On a Home You Sold Years Ago

Shakiest cover story yet from defenders of unsustainable government pensions

The upcoming lame-duck legislative session may see a push to reform the state’s notoriously underfunded school and municipal pension systems. As usual, some beneficiaries of the current system are circling the wagons to preserve the unsustainable status quo.

Which beneficiaries? Not current or future retirees — their benefits are guaranteed by the state constitution. No, it’s the bureaucrats who manage these systems. Their jobs become less important if the systems get smaller as new employees are no longer enrolled in them — exactly the reform under consideration.

Pension officials may want to reexamine one new line of defense, though, which compares massive and growing government pension liabilities to a homeowner’s mortgage. That’s the pitch sent by Chris DeRose, CEO of the Municipal Employees' Retirement System of Michigan, in a letter to the editor of Crain’s Detroit Business:

“Yes, pension unfunded liabilities exist; however, having unfunded liability is like having a mortgage. In our 70-year history, our municipalities have made their ‘mortgage’ payments every month while prefunding a portion of their entire mortgage. While paying off the entire mortgage might be desired, having a mortgage is not a crisis.”

ForTheRecord Says: Unfunded pension liabilities are indeed similar to having mortgage debt — on a home you sold and haven’t lived in for 25 years.

Every year, hundreds of millions of Michigan taxpayer dollars go to cover unfunded pension liabilities accrued on behalf of employees who in many cases stopped working decades ago. This happens despite a state constitutional provision that explicitly requires governments to fully fund employees’ future pension benefits in the year they are earned. The rationale, based in prudence and sound moral judgment, is that the benefits should not become a burden on future taxpayers.

These officials have failed in their responsibilities. For example, in 33 of the past 34 years, the people who manage this state’s largest government pension system — the one for school employees — have failed to maintain a pension plan that saved enough to pay the benefits earned by workers. The inevitable consequence is the system’s current $26.7 billion unfunded taxpayer liability.

Yet government pension managers here and elsewhere have sandbagged reform efforts by spreading tales of mythical “transition costs” and other objections.

Apparently, that cover story has worn thin with lawmakers, which may explain the new story, the mortgage analogy. The officials would do better to accept their share of the blame for saddling taxpayers with billions of unfunded pension debt. Their next step would be to get on board the one reform that’s guaranteed to eventually cure the problem: Stop enrolling new employees in these legacy systems.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

Commentary

Michigan Local Government Revenues Strong Despite Complaints

Taxpayers already provide local governments more money

As Wayne County exits its direct state oversight, some are continuing the call for more money to local governments. Yet Michigan’s taxpayers already are providing local governments with more revenue.

Cities, villages, townships and counties have two major sources of operating revenues: property taxes and sales taxes. No local government levies a sales tax, but the state shares a portion of its sales tax revenue with local governments, with a portion mandated by the constitution and a portion that lawmakers determine annually.

Property taxes are a larger source of tax dollars for local governments than the sales tax revenue sharing, but both are important and experienced different trends over the past 15 years.

From 2001 to 2008, combined revenue sharing and local government property tax revenue increased by $1.2 billion, a 21.4 percent gain. Property taxes increased by $1.7 billion but revenue sharing dropped by $479 million.

The recession took its toll on property values in Michigan, so there were fewer dollars generated by property taxes. This decreased revenues by $579 million, an 8.3 percent decline from 2008 to 2012. Revenue sharing declined only $29 million.

Both property tax revenue and revenue sharing have recovered since then, with overall revenue increasing by $553 million from 2012 to 2015. Total property tax revenue is up $381 million and revenue sharing is up $171 million.

There isn’t a report out yet on property tax revenues in 2016, though the state’s revenue estimators predict growth. The state already approved the fiscal year 2017 budget, which includes a small increase in shared revenue.

While these are the overall state trends, each government unit is going to vary.

It is tough to say the revenue system is broken when revenues are up, and especially when the state still hasn’t fully recovered to its 2000 job levels. Better to look on the spending side of local finances.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.