Skyrocketing Pension Costs Trigger Parent Angst Over Loss of Teachers
Just the increase in pension costs could have hired 140 new Grand Ledge educators
At a recent event related to the Grand Ledge school district, teachers and parents expressed concern over the loss of departure of some teachers. A TV station report on the meeting said the district is losing 19 teachers, 12 to retirement.
Yet most attendees were unaware that just the increase in the district's costs for the school employee pension system over the past five years could have paid the salaries of about 140 new teachers (not including benefits). To put this context, state figures show that Grand Ledge had 280 teachers in 2013-14.
The Grand Ledge school district shares a challenge with many others in Michigan: It is getting more state dollars but not “feeling” the increase because dollars are being sucked away by the skyrocketing costs of the state-run school pension system.
In June of 2010, the district paid $4.2 million into the pension system. For 2015-16, the district has budgeted $9.2 million for those costs – an increase of $5 million.
“It is significant,” said Grand Ledge Superintendent Brian Metcalf. “It has significantly impacted what we have been able to do in regards to employees. All across the state, districts are dealing with these tough numbers.”
James Hohman, the Mackinac Center for Public Policy's assistant director of fiscal policy, has done extensive research on the Michigan school pension system, and recommends closing it to new employees, who would instead get contributions to tax-deferred personal savings accounts. He argues that partial reform measures enacted by recent legislatures have not addressed the core of the problem, which is persistent underfunding that has gone on for decades.
Metcalf agreed that what the state has done so far hasn’t worked.
“What we have done so far with policy has created a crisis in our pension system,” Metcalf said.
The TV station covering the event reported “a loss of funds in the district over the years has posed some challenges.”
WLNS-TV is one of many news outlets erroneously reporting that school districts are getting less money from the state.
Total state funding for Grand Ledge increased by almost $4 million between the 2010-11 and the 2015-16 school years, over which time the district added 27 students. It received $30.38 million in 2010-11, when 5,069 students were enrolled. In 2014-15, the district got $34.32 million for 5,096 students.
While total state funding went up, the district’s foundation allowance had decreased from $7,426 per student in 2010-11 to $7,126 in 2014-15. The foundation allowance is what the state gives a district to cover operational costs. It doesn’t include what the state gives a district for costs such as special education or employee pensions.
It’s not uncommon for a district to get millions of extra dollars from the state because of the growing costs of employee pensions, but get less or the same in foundation allowance money. The foundation allowance historically has been anywhere from 70 to 85 percent of the total amount of money a district receives from the state.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Economic Freedom of the World Index: America’s Worrisome Decline
The U.S. ranks 16th in economic freedom
The “Economic Freedom of the World Index” published by the Fraser Institute of Canada measures the degree to which the world’s 157 nations and territories permit voluntary, peaceful economic exchanges between their own citizens and with people in other countries. The most recent index has just been released, and based on data from 2013, it ranks the United States 16th in economic freedom.
Given this country’s history and traditions, America should be far and away No. 1; that fact that it does not hold the top slot is yet more evidence of how governance has gone off track in this country in recent years.
The index is based on five major categories of data: the size of the government; the strength of the legal system, including property rights; the soundness of the local currency; the freedom to trade with other nations; and economic regulations. Within these categories are more than 40 variables, such as “government consumption as a share of total consumption” (in the “size of government” category) and “inflation: most current year” (in the “sound money” category). Each variable gets a score. All the scores within a category are converted into an average score for the category, and the categories are averaged together to give a country’s overall score. The highest possible score is 10.
The overall score for the U.S. is 7.73, down 0.9 points since 2000. This decline may seem small, but the index’s authors observe that it is three times the average decline among the top-20 nations that comprise the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the largest and most diversified economies in the world. More important for real people, our decline is reflected in the real-world consequence of slower economic growth, which means less opportunity for all Americans.
America’s declining economic liberty goes against a worldwide trend of growing freedom. In 1980 the average freedom index score for nations appearing in the index was 5.31. As of 2013 the world average stands at 6.86. According to the authors, the U.S. was ranked first among OECD nations from 1970 through 2000 (and in about third place if Hong Kong and Singapore were added to that list).
Since then our decline has been precipitous. It also portends a slower economic growth rate than Americans have been accustomed to, as much as half of the three percent annual growth we once enjoyed.
Some of the 15 nations that outperformed the U.S. in the current index may surprise you. They include, ranked from highest to lowest: Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, Mauritius, Jordan, Ireland, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, Georgia, Chile, Qatar and Taiwan.
Good for them, but honestly: Georgia, Jordan, UAE and Qatar? How low the mighty have fallen to be surpassed by such recently benighted polities.
For example, just 25 years ago Georgia was the “Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic,” its people chained by the dead hand of communist central planning, coercion and corruption. On a more hopeful note, if even Georgia can throw off its chains, then surely the U.S. can unwind the damage done by 15-plus years of bad federal policies.
This is a vital task, because economic freedom correlates with so many of the things people value, not the least of which is material well-being. Per capita personal income for countries in the bottom 25 percent of the index averages less than $7,000, while average annual incomes in the highest quartile all exceed $38,600. Those who imagine this to be just coincidence might consider investing their retirement nest eggs in Venezuela, Republic of Congo or Libya, the three least-free nations economically.
The Fraser Institute also publishes economic freedom indexes for the states and provinces of Canada, Mexico and the U.S., with the 2015 edition coming out later this year. In last year’s index, using data through 2012, Michigan was a mediocre 37th among the 50 states, up from a dismal 45th place in 2009. It will be interesting to see how the Great Lake State fares in rankings assembled after its right-to-work law went into effect in 2013.
Empirical evidence shows that economic liberty and human well-being are highly correlated. If the world’s policymakers were to govern on this basis, world poverty would be reduced and the untold human tragedies associated with subsistence-level existence would be that much fewer.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Enjoying CapCon?
Make sure you aren’t missing anything! Sign up for our daily or weekly emails and get the quarterly print edition mailed to your home. All free!
Get CapCon emails! Get CapCon print!
No thanks, I prefer to visit the CapCon website!
More From CapCon