In 2007, Pattengill Elementary School Teacher Kim Hoke was one of three state finalists for the Michigan Department of Education's Teacher of the Year award. 

That year, Hoke made $50,185. There were 10 gym teachers in the Berkley School District in Oakland County who made more money than her that year.

Now, five years later, Hoke ranks 157^th out of the 285 teachers in the Berkley School District in Oakland County, and had her salary frozen at $64,372 in 2012-13, according to documents obtained in a Freedom of Information Act request.

"They're not paying good teachers what they're worth," said Audrey Spalding, education policy director for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. "The district's teacher salary schedule ensures that Hoke's pay is based on the number of years she's worked for the district, and her degree. By not basing teacher pay on performance, Berkley is shortchanging its best teachers."

Teacher compensation has been a big topic this year as unions and state officials oppose having teachers paid based on performance and accomplishments, instead wanting the system of longevity and education level to be the sole determining factors.

House Bill 4625 would require that job performance and job accomplishments be the "primary" factor used to determine compensation and that evaluation of job performance be based primarily upon student growth data.

The bill only applies to teachers and administrators hired after the effective date of the bill, if passed. Other teachers would have the ability to opt in.

In opposition to the bill, the Michigan Education Association quoted Donald Heller, dean of the Michigan State University College of Education, as saying: "Research shows that teachers improve in skill level as they gain in experience. This bill does little to ensure we have the best people teaching our students in the state of Michigan."

Heller said in an email that he doesn't oppose performance pay "as long as it is fairly constructed and uses measures that have been validated and shown to be reliable measures of teacher (or administrator) performance."

Heller said he objected to the legislation because it prohibited districts from compensating teachers and administrators even in part on experience and education and it was taking local control away from district school boards.

"I think you can construct an educator compensation plan that combines experience and education levels along with fair performance measures," Heller said.

Hoke is not alone. Grosse Pointe North High School science teacher Gary Abud was named "Teacher of the Year" in Michigan for 2013-2014, but the union salary schedule ranks him 477th out of 595 teachers for salary in his Grosse Pointe Public Schools district.

Hoke, School Board President Paul Ellison and Berkley Communications Supervisor Jessica Stilger didn't respond to requests for comment. 

Former U.S. Congressman Pete Hoekstra says if Michigan lawmakers refuse to expand Medicaid, it could help force the federal government to change Obamacare.

"I think the more that people resist implementation of Obamacare, the more likely it will be that we'll see incremental reforms to it," Hoekstra said Wednesday.

Hoekstra, who served 18 years in Congress, went on to say that the more that individual states go along with Obamacare by expanding Medicaid, the harder it will be to change or reverse the direction of Obamacare.

"Increasingly, there are Republicans and Democrats who are foreseeing that this (Obamacare) will be a train wreck," Hoekstra said. "The more people there are who are already riding that train, the louder the outcry will be to keep it going."

Hoekstra's observations come as the Michigan Senate considers House Bill 4714, a measure to expand Medicaid in Michigan. The bill has been passed by the Michigan House, with 48 Democrats and 28 Republicans supporting it. If the Senate passes the bill it will be on its way to Gov. Rick Snyder, who would likely sign it into law.

Medicaid expansion is currently the top issue state lawmakers face regarding Obamacare. The Obama administration has tied hundreds of millions of dollars up-front to states that are willing to expand Medicaid.

Hoekstra said that Michigan lawmakers should say "no" to Medicaid expansion, not only because of its national implications, but also because of its long-term fiscal implications.

"Expanding a statewide program and betting that the federal dollars will be there long term would be very risky for a state like Michigan," Hoekstra said. "There are already people in Washington, D.C., talking about cutting dollars on the federal end and putting more of a burden on the states."