News Story

Majority of Fastest-Growing U.S. Cities Are In Right-to-Work States

77 of the top 100

The city of Cedar Park in Texas was the fastest growing city in terms of percentage growth from 2010 to 2012 when it increased 12 percent to 57,957 people, according to U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics.

Eight of the top 15 fastest growing cities were in Texas, a right-to-work state. The state was a big reason why 77 of the top 100 fastest-growing cities were in right-to-work states.

Eighteen right-to-work states had cities crack the top 100. There were six non-right-to-work states and Washington, D.C., that made the top 100. Three of the top 100 fastest growing cities were from Indiana, which didn’t become a right-to-work state until 2012 so its cities were not included as from a right-to-work state.

Texas has the most cities in the top 100 with 27. California had nine cities and Georgia had eight.

“Since the recession ended, much of the growth in the country is happening in right-to-work states,” said James Hohman, a fiscal policy analyst at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.

Novi was the fastest growing city in Michigan and ranked 221st overall. It grew 3.1 percent to 56,912 in 2012. Michigan was not a right-to-work state in 2012. Royal Oak ranked 371st overall and it grew 2.1 percent to 58,410.

Antony Davies, an associate professor of economics at Duquesne University, said he was not surprised that so many cities in right-to-work states were growing quickly.

“Right to work is a significant component of economic freedom. In every year from 1985 to 2009 (the last year measured), states with the most economic freedom have seen significantly more population growth than states with less economic freedom,” Davies said in an email. “Union proponents claim that unions protect workers, yet the data say otherwise. Again, in every year from 1985 through 2009, the 25 most economically free states have seen higher incomes, lower unemployment rates, lower poverty rates, and (interestingly) more equitable income distributions than did the 25 least economically free states.”

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

Commentary

June 14, 2013, MichiganVotes.org Weekly Vote Report

Votes on Medicaid and state budget

House Bill 4714, Accept federal health care law Medicaid expansion: Passed 76 to 31 in the House
To expand Medicaid eligibility to families and childless adults up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, which implements a key component of the federal health care law (aka “Obamacare”). Under that law, the feds are supposed to pay 100 percent of the expansion’s cost during the first three years, with the state responsible for not more than 10 percent of the costs starting in 2020. The House-passed version of the bill does not contain a provision in the original requiring the federal government to approve certain cost-saving state Medicaid reforms before the expansion may proceed. All but one Democrat voted "yes," and a majority of Republicans (30 out of 59) in the Republican-controlled House voted "no."

Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"


House Bill 4813, Create process for dissolving fiscally-failed school districts: Passed 58 to 49 in the House
To establish criteria and procedures for dissolving a school district that has become so financially unviable that it can no longer educate students, and for attaching the failed district’s territory to one or more nearby school districts. The bill was introduced after the Buena Vista and Inkster school districts reached this state shortly before the end of the 2012-2013 school year.

Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"


Senate Bill 284, Authorize electric bill surcharge for low income heating subsidies: Passed 86 to 21 in the House
To authorize imposing a $1 per month surcharge on customer electric utility bills, and use the money to provide up to $50 million annually in low income home heating subsidies.

Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"


Senate Bill 163, Revise wetland use permit details: Passed 66 to 42 in the House
To expand certain exemptions to a state wetland permit mandate, increase some wetland permit fees and reduce others, require permit denials to document their rationale and authority, authorize grants to local governments to create “wetland mitigation banks,” slightly reduce wetland regulatory burdens imposed on county drain commission projects, slightly increase the state's burden to justify restrictions on an owner's use of his or her property, prohibit the Department of Environmental Quality from imposing regulations that are beyond the scope of those required by federal law, and make other changes to these land use restrictions.

Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"


House Bill 4743, Allow local holiday fireworks regulations: Passed 37 to 0 in the Senate
To allow local governments to ban the use of "consumer fireworks" between midnight and 8:00 a.m. on the day before, day of, and day after a national holiday (in larger communities the allowable deadline would be 1:00 a.m. on New Years). The 2012 law legalizing these fireworks (which include firecrackers, bottle rockets, aerial spinners, Roman candles, etc.) essentially preempted local bans on their use at all hours during these holiday periods.

Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"


House Bill 4328, Final 2013-14 state budget: Passed 63 to 46 in the House
The final House-Senate compromise version of the non-education portion of the state government budget for the fiscal year that begins on Oct. 1, 2013. This would appropriate $34.392 billion, compared to $34.355 billion the previous year. (When interdepartmental transfers are deducted the amounts are slightly lower.)
When amounts appropriated for education are added (see House Bill 4228), the state budget for the next fiscal year will be $49.520 billion, of which $19.331 billion is federal money. Total state spending from state taxes, fees, fines, etc. will be $30.189 billion, a 4.0 percent increase over the previous year.

Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"


House Bill 4328, Final 2013-2014 state budget: Passed 24 to 14 in the Senate
The final House-Senate compromise version of the non-education portion of the state government budget for the fiscal year that begins on Oct. 1, 2013. See description above.

Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"


House Bill 4459, Prohibit TIFA “capture” of Detroit Zoo or Arts tax money: Passed 38 to 0 in the Senate
To prohibit the “capture” by a local Tax Increment Finance Authority (such as a Downtown Development Authority) of regional property taxes imposed to subsidize the Detroit Zoo and the Detroit Institute for the Arts.

Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"


Senate Bill 300, Establish and impose minimum indigent defense standards: Passed 32 to 6 in the Senate
To establish statewide standards and accountability measures for court-appointed attorneys who represent indigent criminal defendants, and establish a process by which all counties in the state would be required to conform with the standards. If a local government failed to adopt them, a state commission could take over its indigent defense administration, and impose a gradually increasing portion of the state’s costs for this, up to 40 percent. Locals would be responsible for maintaining funding at current levels, and all this would be subject to a detailed appeals process. The bill authorizes but does not fund state grants to cover increased costs.

Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"


Senate Bill 271, Revise corporate and developer subsidy regime: Passed 36 to 2 in the Senate
To increase the maximum amount of state “community revitalization” subsidies that can be awarded to a particular developer, corporation or other special interest, from $1 million to $2.5 million. The bill would also eliminate various statutory prescriptions and restrictions on how the political appointees on the Michigan Strategic Fund board may spend state revenues allocated to this subsidy program, and delete certain disclosure and reporting requirements.

Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"


Senate Bill 272, Authorize corporate and developer “port facility” subsidies: Passed 37 to 1 in the Senate
To expand the mission of the "Michigan Strategic Fund" agency to include providing undefined subsidies for corporations, developers and other entities involved in port facilities.

Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"


SOURCE: MichiganVotes.org, a free, non-partisan website created by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, providing concise, non-partisan, plain-English descriptions of every bill and vote in the Michigan House and Senate. Please visit https://www.michiganvotes.org.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.