BREAKING NEWS: 'Protect Working Families' Lists Proposal 2 Business Supporters Without Their Knowledge
The "Protect Working Families" website promoting Proposal 2, lists 598 small businesses as “Main Street” supporters. That is three-tenths of a percent of Michigan businesses, but even at that, getting those businesses as supporters was a stretch.
Proponents of changing the state constitution to enshrine collective bargaining and override state laws have repeatedly claimed that its group is supported by "1,000 small businesses."
Democrat former state and U.S. representative Mark Schauer said on the Craig Fahle Show on WDET that "about 1,000 small businesses" including his wife's business supports Proposal 2. The Proposal 2 supporter's website lists less than 600 and many of those repudiate the fact that they are listed as supporters.
For example, Kilwins, a speciality candy store, was listed as a supporter and had their logo put on the top of the website.
"What's the address that they got that on?" asked Don McCarty, president of Kilwins Candy Stores. "Because that's absolutely not our position."
A check of other businesses found that many had no public presence on the Internet or in web business data bases. One went out of business last year. Several were linked to activist websites, while some had no idea their business was listed on a Proposal 2 website at all. And some businesses that actively support collective bargaining in the state constitution did not want a union in their shop.
The Mackinac Center for Public Policy, with help from the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity, visited a number of businesses on the "Main Street" list over the last couple of weeks. Nearly half were located in Macomb County on only a handful of streets.
"One of the things I could tell just by walking that block was that the Proposal 2 supporter who walked that block went door-to-door-to-door,” said Benjamin Yount of the Franklin Center.
Several business owners who remember signing a document about the election had little knowledge of Proposal 2. When told what Proposal 2 did, one business owner said she changed her mind. Other business owners didn't realize their business would end up on a Proposal 2 supporter website, while others agreed to sign the paper and put a Proposal 2 sticker in their window to support their union customer base.
"A sticker ended up in my window because they came door-to-door to businesses ... and they want you to support the union and everything like that," said tattoo artist Alvin Cardin. "Some things I support on the union, a lot of things nowadays I don't."
"The union has gotten out of control and it has cost a lot of people businesses. It has cost a lot of people jobs. It's going to hurt the economy in some ways."
Staffers at the "Protect Working Families" headquarters in Detroit said they were too busy to talk about the recruitment process when a reporter visited the headquarters. Calls to the office have been not been returned.
~~~~~
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Super-Seniority
Prop 2 Would Protect Union Bosses at the Expense of Qualified Teachers
For most school districts, value is placed highest on teacher seniority. In fact, nearly all teacher union contracts require that layoff, recall and placement decisions be made strictly by seniority. But oddly, several districts appear to value union bosses the most.
The Hamtramck school district is a good example. Its union contract specifies that the local union president "shall have district-wide super seniority." Essentially, the union boss gets first dibs at any available job in the district he or she wants and will be the last person ever pink-slipped. The Warren Woods school district grants the same perk to its local union boss.
Ypsilanti’s teacher union contract has a similar provision as well. It guarantees union presidents their current position for the duration of their term. If the position has to be eliminated, the union boss is assured a position for which he or she is qualified (potentially "bumping" another teacher out of their job). The contract also allows the president to skip out on 50 percent of his or her teaching responsibilities to devote more time to union business.
The Farmington and Muskegon school districts take the super-seniority even further. Farmington’s contract automatically grants the union president, vice-president, secretary and treasurer the highest level of seniority in the district. The Muskegon teacher contract states that the union president, president-elect, secretary, grievance chairs (two of them) and negotiations chair "shall be exempt from layoff or displacement procedures."
Reforms passed last year attempted to eventually end these "last in/first out" and "dance of the lemons" policies that weaken the overall quality of Michigan's teacher corps.
If Proposal 2 passes, however, it's expected that most school districts will revert back to the pre-reform status quo. And for all the talk about how collective bargaining serves all teachers' best interest, these super-seniority provisions are clear examples of how the process can be easily hijacked for the exclusive benefit of self-serving union bosses.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Enjoying CapCon?
Make sure you aren’t missing anything! Sign up for our daily or weekly emails and get the quarterly print edition mailed to your home. All free!
Get CapCon emails! Get CapCon print!
No thanks, I prefer to visit the CapCon website!
More From CapCon