News Story

While Schools Ignore Merit Pay Law, State Has No Authority to Enforce It

Most districts pay based strictly on seniority and degree-level

Many public school districts have refused to reward its best teachers with "merit pay" in the five years since a state law was passed mandating the practice. That's in part because the Michigan Department of Education doesn't track whether the practice is followed and has no authority to enforce the law.

In 2010, motivated in part by the promise of competitive grants attached to the federal education reform initiative known as Race to the Top, the Michigan Legislature passed a law requiring all school districts to implement some form of merit pay system for teachers. Specifically, legislation signed by Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm requires school districts to include job performance and accomplishments "as a significant factor” in teacher pay decisions.

But several school districts have acknowledged in emails to Michigan Capitol Confidential that they have not complied. The Michigan Department of Education has acknowledged that it does not track school districts' compliance with the law. Martin Ackley, spokesman for the MDE, said the law doesn’t give the state any enforcement authority. Ackley said neither the merit pay law nor the school funding law provides any specific penalty or consequence to a district that ignores the merit pay law.

“Based on our research, school districts have, by and large, decided not to reward great teachers, even though state law clearly requires it,” said Michael Van Beek, the director of research at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. “If policymakers want to encourage more great teachers, they will need to add punitive measures for violating the law so that districts can’t keep ignoring it.”

Without a merit pay system in place, school districts continue to pay teachers based on the number of years they’ve been employed in the district and the number of academic credentials they’ve accumulated.

It’s a system that is essentially modeled on compensation models used in industrial-era assembly lines. As a result, there can be highly effective teachers working alongside much less effective teachers who are paid thousands of dollars more just because they have more years on the job and have accumulated more academic credit hours.

New State Superintendent Brian Whiston says he favors of merit pay.

“Pay should be based on what you are teaching (subject), your evaluation, years of service, education, what extras you bring to the position (extra training, certifications, experiences),” Whiston said in an email in June. “I would like to also look at incentives for teachers that teach in certain areas of the state. I think that teachers who do a great job (get a years or more of growth) should receive additional compensation. If that is what is meant as merit pay then yes I support it.”

Ironically, Michigan’s response to the federal Race to the Top grant program was not deemed sufficient to earn the state any of those extra federal dollars.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

Commentary

Michigan House Passes Package Repealing Outdated Laws

Taking the first step toward crucial reforms

There are over 3,000 criminal statutes in Michigan, but a recent unanimous vote in the Michigan House will trim that number, eliminating several outdated laws in the first step toward simplifying the state’s enormous penal code.

Overcriminalization has recently come into the spotlight in Michigan as part of a larger movement pursuing criminal justice reform. In 2014, the Mackinac Center and the Manhattan Institute published a study on the topic, Overcriminalizing the Wolverine State. The study advocated for clarification and consolidation of the current criminal code, guidelines to govern the creation of new criminal offenses and enactment of a default mens rea provision — requiring the state to consider a person’s intent before convicting them of a crime.

Since its publication, several organizations have relied on the research, and Gov. Rick Snyder used it as the basis for several recommendations he gave in a recent plan to reform the criminal justice system. The House Fiscal Agency also pointed to the study in its analysis of the bills passed in the House this week.

As reported by MLive, those bills include measures to repeal such irrelevancies as prohibitions of duels, trespassing in oddly specific areas and using the term “lost manhood” in advertising. Some of the more pertinent repeals include laws that criminalize embellishing the national anthem, cursing in front of women and children and hosting a walkathon or similar contest of endurance.

I have never trespassed in a huckleberry marsh and I do my best not to embellish The Star Spangled-Banner beyond sense or recognition, but the existence of these laws is a sobering insight into the state of Michigan’s current criminal code. Even after the repeal of these laws, there will still be over 3,000 that I (and almost every other Michigander) could potentially break without intention or malice.

The recent House repeals address laws that are mostly redundant and silly, but many others among those 3,000 fall into the dangerous category of unknown and enforceable. That’s how people go to jail for keeping rabbits.

There is much more work to be done on the subject of overcriminalization, but the House's action is a good start toward more meaningful reforms.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.