All Four Teachers in New Schauer Ad Claiming School Cuts are in Districts Receiving More Money
A new Mark Schauer for governor political advertisement features four teachers from four different school districts who claim that Gov. Rick Snyder has cut funding to their districts.
But in fact, on a per-student basis, all four districts actually received more taxpayer money in 2013-14 than they did in 2010-2011, which was the last budget approved by Gov. Jennifer Granholm.
The ad features seven teachers but only four specifically cite lower funding.
For months Schauer, who is the Democratic candidate for the state’s top office, has claimed that Gov. Snyder cut funding to public schools. This claim has been refuted by several sources.
Specifically, this week Detroit Free Press reporter Paul Egan fact-checked and found "truthful" a political ad by Gov. Snyder denying that his administration cut $1 billion from public education.
Egan added, “That's more than can be said for the education funding stories told in ads sponsored by Democratic candidate Mark Schauer and the Democratic Governors Association."
The teachers in the Schauer ad referred to above are employed by Lincoln Consolidated Schools, Ann Arbor Public Schools, Novi Community Schools and the Plymouth Education Center charter public school. All four claim in the ad that their schools are getting less money today under Gov. Snyder.
Yet the three conventional school districts and one charter school each received more state dollars per student in 2013-14 than in 2010-11 according to the Michigan Department of Education.
State funding for Michigan public schools is complex. It contains several different components and is also tied to student enrollment numbers.
Novi High School teacher Chandra Madafferi is one of the individuals in the Schauer ad. She recently testified at a Senate hearing on behalf of the Michigan Education Association, the state’s largest teacher union.
In the ad, Madafferi responds to a question about whether Gov. Snyder increased funding to schools. “Definitely not mine,” she answers.
That answer would be accurate if it referred to just one particular part of state funding — the “per-pupil foundation allowance” — but is false for overall state funding. Adding to the potential for confusion, the foundation allowance is actually a mixture of state and local funds.
Looking at just state dollars — not federal or local money — Novi Community Schools received $6,404 per student in 2013-14, which is about $1,000 more per student than the $5,411 it received in 2010-11. Overall, the district received $34.1 million in state dollars in 2010-11, with 6,315 students enrolled, and $41.3 million in 2013-14, with 6,443 students enrolled.
These state dollars are divided into several pots, including the state’s contribution to the foundation allowance, money for school employees’ retirement benefit costs and special education, school lunch programs and “best practices” incentive payments. The foundation allowance component did fall, from $8,799 per pupil in 2010-2011 to $8,359 per pupil in 2013-14, but in total Novi schools received substantially more dollars per student from state taxpayers in 2013-2014 than three years ago.
The tale is similar in the other three districts cited in the Schauer ad. Lincoln Consolidated Schools saw its total per-pupil funding from the state increase from $6,819 in 2010-11 to $7,727 in 2013-14. State funding to the Ann Arbor district jumped from $5,215 per student in 2010-11 to $5,626 in 2013-14. The Plymouth Education Center charter public school saw its per pupil funding from the state increase from $7,691 in 2010-11 to $7,773 in 2013-14.
Here are the most recent figures (2012-2013) for how much each school district received per student when all funding sources including federal dollars are included: $10,454 to Novi; $10,104 to Lincoln Consolidated; $11,460 to Ann Arbor; and $8,434 to the Plymouth Education Center.
Statewide, the number of state dollars spent on K-12 education has increased every year Gov. Snyder has been in office, rising from $11.01 billion in 2011-12 and $11.21 billion in 2012-13 to $11.60 billion in 2013-14, according to the Senate Fiscal Agency.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
State Legislators Take Care of Themselves
Even from the grave
Members of the political class here and elsewhere have a reputation for always taking care of their own. Chasers of public office may wax eloquent about their selfless “public service,” but the truth is that no one checks their self-interest at the doors of the Capitol.
Elected officials maximize their own interests in a number of ways: pay, prestige, perquisites and more. Under term limits, perhaps the highest priority of the political careerists who populate the Legislature is paving the way for their next elected or appointed job when they are termed-out of their current one. Toward this end, they are often willing to demonstrate loyalty to the system by glorifying it along with their current and former colleagues.
For example, House Bill 5843 would create a “Legislative Funeral Act” to require the state of Michigan (that is, taxpayers) give a state flag to the survivor of current or former state legislators who die.
Michigan state lawmakers are already some of the best paid in America and can easily buy their own flag. That’s not the real point of the bill, however. Rather, it is to puff up the importance of the statewide political elite to which they currently belong, in pursuit of remaining a member even after they are termed-out of their current slot.
The bad news with this bill is that it actually has 61 sponsors. The good news is that while it is modeled on a similar measure introduced in 2009, unlike that proposal this one does not require that taxpayers pay for a State Police escort for the funeral processions of current and former legislators. Both bills featured a large number of co-sponsors from both parties. (One of the earlier bill’s freshman co-sponsors publicly apologized for his rookie error in political judgment.)
The “Legislative Funeral Act” measures are hardly the only bills introduced by Lansing politicians to immortalize their own. Former state lawmakers Dominic Jacobetti and Harry Gast have stretches of roads named after them. Former Sen. Glen Steil Sr. (father of former Rep. Glen Steil Jr.) has a law named for him, and the name of a former higher education appropriations chairman, the late Rep. Morris Hood Jr., decorates an education-related program.
In 2012, state Sen. Gretchen Whitmer offered an amendment to Senate Bill 534 which would rename the proposed law the “John J. Gleason gift of life plate” after the very politician who introduced the law in the first place. The amendment and law were both adopted.
The attempts to glorify a current or recent legislator don’t always fly, such as one state senator’s amendment to name a property-rights infringing business and restaurant smoking ban after a current colleague, Sen. Ray Basham, which failed by voice vote. Nor does it matter that most Michigan residents will never recognize the former politician names attached to roads, buildings, programs, laws, etc. As mentioned, these measures are about serving a state and local political system to which these political careerists are desperate to remain attached, and have little to do with the general public.
The dignity of that system — such as it is — may need some institutional guardrails against the self-serving excesses of its members. At the very least a politician should have to be dead before former colleagues start naming things after him or her. Preferably for a good long time, like say 50 years. Only with the fullness of time can the people and elected officials acquire some needed perspective on the real value of a particular politician’s contributions.
Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.
Follow us on social media!
Push back on big government “solutions” by becominga fan of us on Facebook and X. Plus you can share free-market news to your network!
Facebook
I already follow CapCon!
More From CapCon