(Editor's note: This story has been edited to add more context to the thoughts presented from the original email.)

A Lansing-based civil rights attorney who has held positions with the Michigan Republican Party and Department of Corrections, questioned in a widely distributed email today whether armed rebellion was justified over the Supreme Court ruling upholding Obamacare.

Matthew Davis sent the email moments after the Supreme Court ruling to numerous new media outlets and limited government activists with the headline: “Is Armed Rebellion Now Justified?”

He stressed that he wasn't calling for armed rebellion but added his own personal note to the email, saying, “… here’s my response. And yes, I mean it.”

He said he was writing with an "eye toward asking at what point the Republic is in peril."

“There are times government has to do things to get what it wants and holds a gun to your head," Davis said. "I’m saying at some point, we have to ask the question when do we turn that gun around and say no and resist.

"Was the American Revolution justified?”

Davis said the key word was “justified,” adding that a peaceful resolution toward changing the law is the goal. He said rebellion often is the end result of people who get backed against a wall and wondered when that might occur when it comes to the Obamacare ruling.

"If government can mandate that I pay for something I don't want, then what is beyond its power?" he wrote. "If the Supreme Court's decision Thursday paves the way for unprecedented intrusion into personal decisions, than has the Republic all but ceased to exist? If so, then is armed rebellion today justified? God willing, this oppression will be lifted and America free again before the first shot is fired."

Davis said he wasn't calling for violence, rather he was pointing out that historically that is what has occurred at times in America. He compared armed rebellion to a situation where the government cannot get your money by way of liens or seizure of bank accounts is coming to arrest you for not paying an unconstitutional tax.

“You can’t have people walking with lattes and signs and think the object of your opposition is going to take you seriously,” Davis said. “Armed rebellion is the end point of that physical confrontation.”

Here’s his email:

Is Armed Rebellion Now Justified?

Implicit in Benjamin Franklin's fabled response at the conclusion of the Constitutional Convention was a dire warning: That the Republic would one day devolve into tyranny unless we the people prevented it.

In 2008, we the people elected Barack Obama as president, and the 100-year progressive trek to tyranny begun in 1912 with Woodrow Wilson's election was complete. It cannot be said too many times — for the purposes of emphasis and clarity — that the Constitution was possible ONLY AFTER the American Revolution; and that the war itself would not have been possible without the collective agreement, as so eloquently articulated in the Declaration of Independence, that the course of human events will sometimes justify one group of people to sever themselves from their oppressors.

In other words, America itself was possible only after its people summoned the will to risk their lives and their futures — as well as those of their children — for a freedom they did not enjoy but knew was their gift from God. Along with their desire to be free came their willingness to engaged in armed rebellion for their freedom.

If government can mandate that I pay for something I don't want, then what is beyond its power? If the Supreme Court's decision Thursday paves the way for unprecedented intrusion into personal decisions, then has the Republic all but ceased to exist? If so, then is armed rebellion today justified?

God willing, this oppression will be lifted and America free again before the first shot is fired.

A state program awarding 12 grants totaling $67 million in taxpayer dollars created only a third of the projected jobs.

The Centers of Energy Excellence (COEE) program was supposed to create 1,746 jobs by the end of 2012. Yet according to the latest 21st Century Jobs Fund Annual Report, only 588 of these jobs had been created as of February 29, 2012.

"The definition of insanity is having our state government continue to selectively fund areas of the private economy and be surprised that the outcomes aren’t good," said Wendy Day, president of Common Sense in Government.

Former Gov. Jennifer Granholm announced the program in July 2008. It offered state government funds to match private and federal funds invested in alternative energy companies, with the goal of job creation in the alternative energy industry.

“Creating jobs in the alternative energy industry in Michigan is a major component of our aggressive strategy to build a diverse and global 21st century economy,” the former governor said.

COEE grantees were supposed to gradually receive funding over time after accomplishing milestones that are decided upon as part of the grant agreements. This apparently did not happen.

According to the Auditor General, the Michigan Strategic Fund (MSF) does a poor job of ensuring milestones are met before paying grant recipients. In an audit of all 21^st Century Jobs Fund programs, which included the COEE program as well as four others, nine of 28 randomly selected recipients of MSF funds could not provide sufficient documentation to the Auditor General to support 20 of 245 reported milestone achievements. 

Additionally, the Auditor General found that the MSF “did not sufficiently document its review of eligibility requirements for the Centers of Energy Excellence (COEE) Program … we sampled eight of 27 proposals and noted that MSF did not document its review of eligibility requirements in any of the eight proposals reviewed.”

Martin Dober, Vice President of Entrepreneurship and Innovation for the Michigan Economic Development Corp., told Michigan Capitol Confidential that recipients of COEE funds were required to go through an application process. Dober said that a checklist documenting the application process was to be implemented following the Auditor General's findings, but the program has since been discontinued. The state previously committed $7.6 million, which still will be awarded.

The COEE program is administered by the Michigan Strategic Fund, which claims to hold “broad authority to promote economic development and create jobs.” Funding for the program comes from the 21^st Century Jobs Trust Fund, which funds similar programs previously reported on by Michigan Capitol Confidential.

One of the initial grants went to Mascoma Corp., which was awarded $20 million in September 2008 for a project that was to create 70 jobs.

In 2007, Gov. Granholm said, “Mascoma's decision to choose Michigan … puts Michigan on the leading edge of technology that will create good-paying jobs for Michigan citizens.”

While Mascoma has received the full $20 million, only three jobs have been created in over three years.

Similarly, A123 Systems was awarded $10 million in November 2008 for a project that was to create 750 jobs. The company, which received special attention from President Obama and was awarded a $249 million grant from the federal government, laid off over 100 workers in November while rewarding executives with excellent severance packages.

"If politicians had to invest their own money before mine or any other taxpayer, I think that would stop a lot of this corporate welfare that is bound to fail," Day said.