News Story

Right-to-Work Repeats Itself; Indiana Democrats Manufacture a Filibuster

A dispatch from Indianapolis

INDIANAPOLIS —  In the ongoing battle over right-to-work legislation in Indiana, the state House is still out, although not as far as Illinois this year.

An anticipated joint committee hearing of the House and the Senate is scheduled to occur Friday morning over a proposed right-to-work bill, but for the second consecutive day the Indiana House Democrats have refused to form a quorum — obstructing the legislation from receiving due debate and formal process. House Democrats fled to Illinois last February to protest similar legislation that would have provided right-to-work protections to public-sector employees.

Senate Bill 269 would make it a Class A misdemeanor to require an individual to join or remain in a union or to pay any dues, fees or other charges to that same labor organization. This is commonly referred to as "right-to-work" legislation. In non-right-to-work states, including Michigan, collective bargaining agreements typically require workers to pay a fee in lieu of regular dues if they do not wish to formally join the union.

Republicans hold a 60-40 majority in the 100-member Indiana House, but a two-thirds majority is required on the floor for session to occur. The Democrats' absence can force business to shut down, such as the five-week shutdown of the Indiana House in 2011 over a similar right-to-work bill.

Sen. Scott Schneider, R-Indianapolis, is the fourth name on the proposed bill and one of its sponsors. A member of the Senate Pensions and Labor Committee, he says “It’s an individual liberty issue, not just for an employee but for an employer as well.” As to the House Democrats, he says they are stalling the entire process.

Gov. Mitch Daniels has said he supports the bill, which would make Indiana the 23rd state to adopt right-to-work legislation. Other states that have adopted it include mostly western and southern states like Virginia and Oklahoma; Indiana would be the first in the so-called “Manufacturing Belt.”

Gov. Daniels said in a formal statement, “Seven years of experience at our Indiana Economic Development Corporation have confirmed what every economic development expert tells us: despite our top-ranked business climate, Indiana gets dealt out of hundreds of new job opportunities because we have no right-to-work law.”

Sen. Jim Banks, R-Fort Wayne, supports the bill, but questions the focus solely on the studied economic boosters in right-to-work states, such as increased employment, faster income growth and higher “real pay” after factoring the cost-of-living. Sen. Banks believes it is an issue of morality: “We get in the mud when we talk about those issues. Who owns my labor? I own my labor.”

Hundreds of union supporters, bearing signs that read “Hoosiers Want Union Life Lines Not State Bread Lines” and “This Law of Suppression Invites A Depression,” showed up to protest the bill. There have been numerous reports of out-of-state union busing from states such as Illinois and Missouri to increase protestor numbers.

Harvey Jackson, recording secretary of Local 142 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters in Gary, Ind., arrived with fellow opponents of the legislation via bus. Defending the agency fees that are charged to workers that opt-out of the union, he says “If there are two lines where one has to pay for benefits and one doesn’t, guess which line’s going to be longer?”

House Democrats could presumably stall the bill indefinitely, but they may pay a political price back home with their constituents.

“The 5-week walkout was embarrassing for all the legislators,” says Sen. Banks. “There are Democrats that refuse to walk out this year.”

Gov. Daniels said of the House Democrats’ walkout, “I trust that people’s consciences will bring them back to work.”

Paul Kersey, director of labor policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy says, “We need to have an honest debate about this. We debate, we vote, we pass legislation; that is how a democratic Republic works.”

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

News Story

Every Roll Call Vote by Every State Legislator Tallied for 2011

Individual legislators missed 1,437 votes in 2011, according to MichiganVotes.org 'Missed Votes Report'

For Immediate Release
Thursday, Jan. 5, 2012
Contact: Jack McHugh
Senior Legislative Analyst
or
Michael D. Jahr
Vice President for Communications
989-631-0900

MIDLAND — Michigan’s 38 senators and 110 representatives missed 1,437 votes in 2011, according to the Missed Votes Report compiled by Jack McHugh, editor of MichiganVotes.org. The Michigan Senate took 830 roll call votes during 2011, and the House took 613*. The number of missed votes has been on a dramatic downward trajectory since 2001-2002, when MichiganVotes.org began tracking this information and the average number was more than 10,000 every year. 

Here are the tallies for the previous five legislative sessions; note that unlike the 2011 figure they cover two-year periods: 2001-2002 (21,162 missed votes); 2003-2004 (12,178); 2005-2006 (9,598); 2007-2008 (10,324); 2009-2010 (7,173); total missed votes, 2001-2011 (61,872).

During the 2011 session, three current senators and three current representatives** missed 50 or more votes each. Sixty-six Michigan lawmakers missed no votes. Find out how many (and which) votes your local state legislators missed at the “Missed Votes Report.”

The list can be sorted by name or by number of missed votes. The total number of possible votes is also listed for each legislator (those who were not in office for the entire session have lower numbers). By clicking on a legislator’s name, you can see a brief, plain-English description of the actual votes that he or she missed. Missed vote totals for previous periods can be viewed by entering a different date range.

McHugh said the missed-votes feature is an example of the power of the MichiganVotes.org database. “We now have 11 years of bills and votes in the system — the complete legislative careers of many members. To obtain this information anywhere else, it would be necessary to read and record information from thousands of pages of legislative journals,” he said.

McHugh added that in most cases missed votes occur when other demands within the legislative process call a lawmaker off the floor for a few minutes, or when serious family or personal issues require an absence for an entire day or longer.

“Legislators are people too,” McHugh observed. “We shouldn’t jump to conclusions or assume bad faith. But if a legislator demonstrates a consistent pattern of missed votes for months on end, voters have a right to ask why.

“Large numbers of missed votes get people’s attention,” McHugh added, “but they should be more concerned about the votes their own legislators actually do take, especially when many of these appear to serve the system ahead of the people.”

MichiganVotes.org is a free website provided by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. It provides concise, objective, plain-English descriptions of every bill and every vote by every politician in the Michigan Legislature, searchable and sortable by legislator, topic, keywords, date range and more.

 *MichiganVotes.org roll call vote totals do not include some purely procedural or duplicate votes. When these are included there were 619 House roll calls in 2011, and 844 in the Senate.

**Former Rep. Tim Melton also had more than 50 missed votes, but many occurred between the time he announced his resignation and its effective date.

#####

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.