Right-to-Work Legislation Possible in Indiana

How will this affect Michigan?

By Michael D. LaFaive | January 3, 2012

News reports indicate that Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels and a majority of the Legislature are likely to act quickly on a right-to-work bill that could be introduced this week. Such a move would have significant economic consequences for Michigan.

Right-to-work laws prohibit employers and unions from entering into contracts that make workers’ financial support of the union a condition of employment. There currently are 22 states with RTW laws on the books, and research indicates they outperform neighboring non-RTW states in jobs and state economic growth. No state with a right-to-work law currently borders Michigan.

Perhaps the most important study for assessing the potential impact here of an Indiana RTW law was written by a member of the board of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and released in 1998. It looked at border counties between states with and without RTW laws, and found that manufacturing employment as a percent of county population was one-third higher in the counties in RTW states.

The author, Thomas Holmes of the University of Minnesota, classified whether a state was “pro-business” or not based on its RTW status and concluded, “[O]n average, there is a large abrupt increase in manufacturing activity when crossing a state border from an anti-business state into a pro-business state.”

Holmes explained that identifying the impact of state policies is challenging because it requires teasing out unrelated factors. For example, southern states tend to have better weather and at least the perception of hostility to unionization that may lead to greater manufacturing employment in those states. These effects are minimized by focusing on border counties, where no great difference in union attitudes or climate is likely.

Should RTW become law in Indiana, the implications for its neighbor to the north are stark. It is impossible to predict how many current and potential new manufacturers Michigan might lose to a RTW Indiana, but the Holmes paper and other sources suggest that over time the number is likely to be significant.

Indiana already outperforms Michigan in business tax climate and overall state-and-local tax burdens as measured by the Tax Foundation of Washington, D.C. (These rankings do not reflect a major business tax reform enacted by the Michigan Legislature in 2011; the latest Tax Foundation index will be released soon.)

A RTW debate has been simmering for years in Michigan. Republican lawmakers from Gov. Rick Snyder on down have made favorable noises about the policy, but have been less than eager take on the unions by acting. In the past year there has been a surge of grass roots activity promoting RTW here. Watching Indiana drain off Michigan manufacturers may finally force the politicians’ hands.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

Love CapCon?

The best way you can help support our work is to become a donor. Give monthly or one-time. What do you say — buy our reporters a cup of coffee?

Have a coffee on me! Already a supporter

State Spending: Up, Up and Away

Michigan government spending far outpaces inflation

By Tom Gantert | January 3, 2012

State government in Michigan has spent 20 percent more than the rate of inflation since 1977.

That’s the findings of the Tax Foundation calculation that allows people to track spending within each state. It allows calculations to be made involving state spending or state and local government spending.

The spending limit calculations are done under the assumption of a Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights law (TABOR). The law would not allow a state’s revenue and spending to exceed a defined limit. Anything that is over the limit would be refunded to taxpayers.

The Tax Foundation uses data from the U.S. Census Bureau, which includes spending from state-owned institutions, such as universities.

From 1977 to 2009, the state of Michigan spent $892.5 billion. That was $179.8 billion more than if the state had just kept pace with inflation and population fluctuations.

All the figures listed in the Tax Foundation calculations were adjusted for population and inflation and reported in 2009 dollars.

Michigan’s spending policies haven’t changed for decades and ensure that spending goes up year-after-year, said James Hohman, a fiscal analyst for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.

“Michigan's auto-pilot policies make spending growth increase above what can be justified by population and inflation without much change in policy,” Hohman wrote in an e-mail. “This is largely due to its entitlement programs and ever-growing increases in government employment costs.”

The Tax Foundation describes itself as a nonpartisan educational organization in Washington, D.C. whose goal is to educate taxpayers about the size of the tax burden put on Americans by government.