Commentary

Medical Freedom Zones

America’s health care system is a dysfunctional mess for a fundamental reason: There is no real market in health care. It was wrecked by a combination of incentive-skewing federal tax policies, innovation-killing “fee for service” payment systems in the two federal programs that pay for practically half of all health care consumed (Medicare and Medicaid), restrictive state policies that create limited cartels of health care professionals and facilities (reducing supply and so increasing price), and more.

It all seems a hopeless quagmire, in part because instead of going to the root cause of the dyfunctions to find solutions, politicians have instead “doubled down” on market-killing policies, most recently with the monumentally destructive Obamacare law, which comes on top of innumerable other counter-productive government intrusions enacted on a bipartisan basis at both the state and federal levels.

An interesting proposal from a Mackinac Center sister-think tank in Wyoming seeks to cut this Gordian knot of perverse incentives and pernicious restrictions with something called “medical freedom zones”: a “legally recognized geographic area where health care professionals may provide services and conduct research governed by professional associations and private contracts.”

Here’s more from the paper on the idea authored by the Wyoming Liberty Group:

Both the federal and state governments hamper doctors’ ability to innovate in medicine and to offer more affordable or alternative care. While the federal government delays innovative medicine, state governments make affordable care more difficult by limiting the number of doctors and saddling those who do practice with difficult liability rules. Similarly, the ability of care providers and patients to fashion their own agreements governing medical procedures is entirely hamstrung through state regulation. The result? More than 500,000 Americans fled the United States in 2008 for medical tourism. The time for innovative reform is now.

Alas, even this creative solution cannot get to the root of the problem, because the “freedom zones” don’t fix the two “original sins” primarily responsible for wrecking health care, and which can only be fixed in Washington: Allowing unlimited employer tax deductions for the cost of employee health insurance, and Medicare and Medicaid’s “fee for service” payment model.

The first of these, the tax code, is responsible for the third-party payment system under which, unlike areas where markets truly exist, consumers don’t behave like frugal, prudent value seekers, and providers aren’t forced by competition to respond by becoming innovative, efficiency-generating value-maximizers. The second source of the dysfunctions, Medicare and Medicaid’s payment system, imposes price controls in a way that mostly takes away any reward for providers reducing costs through innovation, destroying the incentive for them to even try.

Fix those two things, and our health care delivery system can finally begin to heal itself by becoming a real market. Leave them untouched, or worse yet pile a huge new layer of regulation, subsidy and rationing on top of them (Obamacare), and no fundamental improvement can ever be expected to occur in our health care system.

It’s in our hands to make this right — but this requires forcing the politicians in Washington to undo these core sources of dysfunction. If they did, medical freedom zones could have the potential to accelerate the healing process for our health care system.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.

News Story

Profiting As Nonprofits: Schools Provide 'Lucrative' Pay and Benefits Despite Status

As superintendent of Kalamazoo Public Schools, Michael Rice had a total compensation of $321,252 in 2010.

Yet Rice was one of a dozen public school superintendents who signed a letter criticizing charter public schools and raising the “for-profit” status of some of the charter school’s contracted management companies.

The teachers in Rice’s district make an average of $20,000 a year more than the median income for a household in the city of Kalamazoo. The median income for a household in the city of Kalamazoo is $31,189.

The average teacher salary in Kalamazoo was $51,391 in 2010, according to the state Department of Education.

Conventional public school district officials have criticized charter schools for contracting with private management companies that are for-profit.

But public school compensation raises questions about how lucrative the conventional school districts have become despite their “nonprofit” status.

Michael Van Beek, education policy director at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, said superintendents have often defended their compensation by comparing it to what executives in the private sector are paid for running similar sized organizations.

“In a general sense, there are all kinds of people who profit off of public education,” said Van Beek. “It seems they are unfairly targeting certain groups.”

Rice didn’t respond to an email seeking comment. Rice, who had a base salary of $208,938, took a salary freeze in 2011.

State Sens. Rebekah Warren, D-Ann Arbor, and Hoon-Yung Hopgood, D-Taylor, are pushing legislation that would ban “for profit” charter schools.

“Already in Michigan, four out of five charter schools are operated by private, for-profit education management organizations,” said Sen. Warren in a Michigan Education Association press release. “Adding a GOP proposal to lift the cap on charter schools would lead to even more for-profit schools in Michigan. Allowing these organizations to continue profiting off the backs of our children is unacceptable.”

Sen. Hopgood said encouraging businesses to make a profit on educating children was “shameful.”

Yet, the nonprofit Ann Arbor Public Schools just agreed to pay its new superintendent $1.22 million over five years (base salary of $245,000).

In fact, the nonprofit Ann Arbor school district has seen its total revenues jump from $195 million in 2005 to $207 million in 2010, despite having about 400 fewer students, according to the Michigan Department of Education.

And Taylor Public Schools pays all of its kindergarten teachers and nine elementary school gym teachers more than the city’s median income for an entire household.

The city of Taylor’s median income for a household is $42,944. Taylor Public Schools had nine elementary school phys-ed teachers and all 23 of its kindergarten teachers make more than $43,000 in 2010.

The average teacher salary in 2010 in the district was $65,477, about $23,000 more than the median household income.

Michigan Capitol Confidential is the news source produced by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Michigan Capitol Confidential reports with a free-market news perspective.