A U.S. Representative who opposed almost 70 percent of amendments to strip out spending or "pork" in certain congressional bills said she is swearing off putting earmarks on her own bills for a year.

The Club for Growth tracked 68 amendments to strip pork from bills and found that Candice Miller, R-Harrison Township, voted for them only 31 percent of the time in its 2009 RePORK Card. The organization reports that six members of Congress from Michigan — including one Democrat — had a higher score than Miller. Overall, 22 of 435 U.S. House members recorded a 100 percent, a perfect score, voting in favor of all the anti-pork amendments.

Miller said the report was not a true picture of her conservative voting record.

Miller read about the report in a Jan. 28 article by Ken Braun in Michigan Capitol Confidential. She sent an e-mail Friday defending her voting record, saying that the Club for Growth had "cherry-picked" certain votes and was arbitrary.

Miller said she voted against the TARP Wall Street bailout twice, against the $787 billion stimulus bill, against the cap-and-trade energy tax bill and against President Barack Obama's health care reform.

"I voted many, many times for amendments that would have cut almost $100 billion from the overall budget," Miller wrote. "Yet some 'grading' groups are citing me for failing on votes about a couple of million dollars of specific earmarks."

Jamie Roe, Miller's chief of staff, said not all earmarks are "wasteful pork spending."

He said one of Miller's earmarks paid for real-time water quality monitoring of the St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair.

"That is not pork," Roe said.

Roe said Miller is changing her stance on earmarks because of recent changes in the rules that limit debate and the ability to strike some earmarks from bills.

"The system is flawed," Roe said. "She agrees we have a huge spending problem in this country that we need to get control of."

Theoretically, when John Szerlag is done with his overhaul of the city of Troy, the only official municipal employees left standing could be his city manager position and the police.

Szerlag is believed to be the first city manager in Michigan to seek to privatize every function of city government except for the police and the volunteer fire department.

There are bids from private contractors to replace the functions of the buiding department as well as a golf course. He said he hopes to have all city functions reviewed for privatization within a year.

"We are looking at everything and anything in terms of what can be done," said Dick Carlisle, a community planner consultant from Ann Arbor, who was hired to help in the transformation.

Szerlag's plan to farm out city duties comes as the city has put a 1.9 millage increase for five years on the ballot that will be voted on Tuesday. The millage would generate $37.7 million over five years, according to the city. If it is defeated, the average Troy tax bill will be $196 less a year.

But Szerlag said that even if the millage passes, he could layoff up to 90 of his 430 employees, because privatization is the more cost-efficient route.

On Tuesday, the Troy city manager will give an update to his employees.

The process involves having a panel of experts — both internal and external — come up with the specifications of the private bid. Once bids are returned, a panel determines the lowest qualified bid.

Then the city departments have the opportunity to match or beat the private bid to save their jobs.

Szerlag said privatization had to be considered because the normal cost-cutting measures weren't enough.

"If we kept on running the way we had, we were economically unsustainable," he said.

One Troy resident against the millage increase wonders why it took so long to consider such cost-cutting measures.

"Why haven't you been doing that before this point if we are in such bad shape?" asked Glenn Clark of Troy. "Why haven't you attempted to reform before now, but only after a massive tax hike?"